PARUL UNIVERSITY,VADODARA vs. THE DY.CIT,EXEMPTION CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

sections 11 and 12 of the Act as the assessee-trust is registered as charitable trust us 12A of the Act. He further

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE1(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PARUL AROGYA SEVA MANDAL TRUST, AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

sections 11 and 12 of the Act as the assessee-trust is registered as charitable trust us 12A of the Act. He further

PARUL AROGYA SEVA MANDAL TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

sections 11 and 12 of the Act as the assessee-trust is registered as charitable trust us 12A of the Act. He further

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PARUL AROGYA SEVA MANDAL TRUST, , AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

sections 11 and 12 of the Act as the assessee-trust is registered as charitable trust us 12A of the Act. He further

SHRI SOUDHARMA BRIHAD TAPOGACHCHIYA TRISTUTIK JAIN SANGHA SAMARPANAM,AHMEDABAD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is devoid of\nmerits and the same is hereby dismissed

charitable trust.\nOne restriction is where the trust or institution is created or established\nfor the benefit of any particular religious community or caste [Section\n13(1)(b)]. In this context, while interpreting the scheme of these\nprovisions, the Supreme Court has held that Section 13 has to be read in\nconjunction with the provisions of Sections 11 and 12

DR K R SHROFF FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-1, EXMP, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed\n\n29

charitable trust, received shares as corpus donation and later sold them for Rs.538.40 Crores. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated this sale consideration as an unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and denied exemption under Sections 11 & 12

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

12 of the Act. Therefore, while construing the meaning and scope of section 13(1) (d) we have to bear in mind the complete scheme of the section. And the cost of repetition we would like to reproduce the relevant part of clause (d) : “(d) 1 in the case of a trust for charitable

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

12 of the Act. Therefore, while construing the meaning and scope of section 13(1) (d) we have to bear in mind the complete scheme of the section. And the cost of repetition we would like to reproduce the relevant part of clause (d) : “(d) 1 in the case of a trust for charitable

THE ACIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

12 of the Act. Therefore, while construing the meaning and scope of section 13(1) (d) we have to bear in mind the complete scheme of the section. And the cost of repetition we would like to reproduce the relevant part of clause (d) : “(d) 1 in the case of a trust for charitable

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

12 of the Act. Therefore, while construing the meaning and scope of section 13(1) (d) we have to bear in mind the complete scheme of the section. And the cost of repetition we would like to reproduce the relevant part of clause (d) : “(d) 1 in the case of a trust for charitable

ACIT (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE 1 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. DR K R SHROFF FOUNDATION, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed\n\n29

Section 11 & 12 of the Act for the reason that according\nto the Assessing Officer, the assessee was not engaged in any charitable\nactivity. The main object of the Trust

SANDEEP MOHANRAJ SINGHI,AHMEDABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE4(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2018-19

Section 11 & 12 of the Act for the reason that according to the Assessing Officer, the assessee was not engaged in any charitable activity. The main object of the Trust

DAWOODI BOHRA MUSAFIRKHANA TRUST,KHAMBHAT vs. THE ITO, WARD (EXEMPTION), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Mrs. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalिनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 Vs. Dawoodi Bohra Musafirkhana Income-Tax Officer, Trust, Ward (Exemption), 1, Dawoodi Bohra Musafirkhana, Vadodara Opp. Bus Stand, Khambhat, Gujarat-388620 Pan : Aaatd 2007 L अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" "" "" यथ" "" "" यथ" यथ"/ (Respondent) यथ" Assessee By : Shri Ankit Chokshi, Ar Revenue By : Shri Ashok Kumar Suthar, Sr Dr सुनवाई क" क" तारीख तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.02.2024 सुनवाई सुनवाई सुनवाई क" क" तारीख तारीख घोषणा क" क" तारीख तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 03.05.2024 घोषणा घोषणा घोषणा क" क" तारीख तारीख आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश Per Annapurna Gupta:

Section 12(1) of the Act is reproduced hereunder : “Income of trusts or institutions from contributions. 12. (1) Any voluntary contributions received by a trust created wholly for charitable

SHRI SOJI JAIN SHWETA DERASAR MURTI PUNJAK SANGH,ANAND vs. THE ITO, WARD(EXEMPTION), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

charitable trust u/s 11, 12 and 13 of the I.T Act, 1961. The said provisions are applicable only to a trust which is registered under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. An AOP though formed for purpose of general public utility or educational purpose etc. cannot claim the benefit of provision of section

THE ITO, (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. GUJARAT INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.219/Ahd/2018 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2013-2014 Income Tax Officer, Gujarat Institute Of Chemical (Exemptions), Vs. Technology, Ward-1, Suraksha Sankool, Thaltej Ahmedabad. Gandhinagar Highway Thaltej, Ahmedabad-380054. Pan : Aaatg2481M

12(2) the donee-trust applies that income for charitable or religious purposes. This does not, however, mean that even if in a given case it is found that through the medium of donation to the charitable institution funds are being diverted to non-charitable purposes, the donee-trust will still be entitled to claim the benefit of section

THE ITO, (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. GUJARAT INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad

12(2) the donee-trust applies that income for charitable or religious purposes. This does not, however, mean that even if in a given case it is found that through the medium of donation to the charitable institution funds are being diverted to non-charitable purposes, the donee-trust will still be entitled to claim the benefit of section

BHOJALRAM LEUVA PATEL SEVA SAMAJ TRUST,DEVKI GALOL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

12. Thus, where the income of a trust is eligible for exemption under Section 11, the eligibility for claiming exemption ought to be tested on the touchstone of the provisions of Section 13. In the instant case, it being established that the respondent-trust is a public charitable

BHOJALRAM LEUVA PATEL SEVA SAMAJ TRUST,DEVKI GALOL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

12. Thus, where the income of a trust is eligible for exemption under Section 11, the eligibility for claiming exemption ought to be tested on the touchstone of the provisions of Section 13. In the instant case, it being established that the respondent-trust is a public charitable