BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Search & Seizureclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi223Mumbai116Karnataka99Bangalore93Hyderabad83Chennai74Jaipur35Pune22Chandigarh17Kolkata17Lucknow16Allahabad16Indore12Patna9Amritsar9Ahmedabad7Dehradun6Cochin6Agra5Telangana5Jodhpur2Nagpur2Raipur2SC2Rajkot1Visakhapatnam1Punjab & Haryana1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 80G18Section 143(3)12Section 2639Section 69C4Section 1324Addition to Income4Deduction4Section 2(15)3Revision u/s 263

SAKAR HEALTHCARE LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT, AHMEDABAD-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1181/AHD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Aseem L Thakkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT. DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 263Section 80G

seizure action u/s 132 of the I.T. Act, 1961 was conducted on 02.02.2021 in the case of "Political Parties and Charitable Organizations Group". The search operation covered mainly 3 registered unrecognized Political Parties namely Manvadhikar National Party (MNP), Kisan Adhikar Party (KAP) and Kisan Party of India (KPI) alongwith 2 charitable Organization namely All India Social Education Charitable Trust

3
Search & Seizure3
Section 112
Section 145(3)2

SAKAR HEALTHCARE LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT, AHMEDABAD-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1172/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: us in both the appeals and for the sake of convenience we are reproducing grounds raised in ITA No.1172/Ahd/2025 pertaining to A.Y. 2020-21:

For Appellant: Shri Aseem L Thakkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT. DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 263Section 80G

seizure action u/s 132 of the I.T. Act, 1961 was conducted on 02.02.2021 in the case of "Political Parties and Charitable Organizations Group". The search operation covered mainly 3 registered unrecognized Political Parties namely Manvadhikar National Party (MNP), Kisan Adhikar Party (KAP) and Kisan Party of India (KPI) alongwith 2 charitable Organization namely All India Social Education Charitable Trust

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. JAMNAGAR AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2425/AHD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Nov 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Smt. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Alok Singh, CIT.D.R
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(2)Section 2(15)

search and seizure powers and are invariably subjected to Parliamentary or legislative oversight. The primary object for setting up such regulatory bodies would be to ensure general public utility. The prescribing of standards, and enforcing those standards, through accreditation and continuing supervision through inspection etc.. cannot be considered as trade, business or commercial activity, merely because the testing procedures

IDEAL SHEET METAL STAMPINGS AND PRESSINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1032/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2020-21

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80G

charitable trust was examined and inquired by the Id AO and based on evidences and reply by the appellant, the deduction u/s.80G was rightly allowed. The provisions of Ideal Sheet Metal Stampings & Pressings Pvt. Ltd, vs. PCIT-1 Page 3 of 7 section 263 to revise the said assessment order are wrongly invoked. It be so held

SUNIL PIYUSH SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. NFAC, DELHI PRESENT JURIS. -THE ITO, WARD-5(3)(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1917/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Piyush Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Chand Meena, Sr. D.R
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 144BSection 147Section 148ASection 244ASection 250Section 270ASection 270A(9)Section 29A

search and seizure action u/s. 132 of the Act was conducted in various cases of political parties including Manvadhikar National Party and 2 Charitable Organizations on 02-02-2021. The statement u/s. 132(4) was recorded on 02-02- 2021 of Shri Ram Bhavan Ojha, National President of the said party and the settler of all India Social Education Charitable

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SANJAY KISHANLAL BISHNOI,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 297/AHD/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Sh. Umedsingh Bhati & Sh. Abhimanyu SinghFor Respondent: Sh. Subhendu Das, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 253(3)Section 69C

seizure should not be held liable for confiscation under the provisions of Section III(m) of the Customs Act, 1962; iii. Differential Customs Duty amounting to Rs. 4,71,06,107/- (Rupees Four Crore Seventy One Lac Six Thousand One Hundred and Seven Only), on 4403.2 MT watermelon Seeds with re-determined value of Rs. 21,30,68,444/-, covered

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SANJAY KISHANLAL BISHNOI,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 296/AHD/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Sh. Umedsingh Bhati & Sh. Abhimanyu SinghFor Respondent: Sh. Subhendu Das, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 253(3)Section 69C

seizure should not be held liable for confiscation under the provisions of Section III(m) of the Customs Act, 1962; iii. Differential Customs Duty amounting to Rs. 4,71,06,107/- (Rupees Four Crore Seventy One Lac Six Thousand One Hundred and Seven Only), on 4403.2 MT watermelon Seeds with re-determined value of Rs. 21,30,68,444/-, covered