SMT. RAJSHRI VASTAL PARIKH,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-5(2)(3), AHMEDABAD
In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 183/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Feb 2022AY 2015-16
Bench: S/Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2015-16 Shri Vatsal Navnitlal Parikh Ito, Ward-5(2)(1) 501, Belvedere Flat Vs Ahmedabad. 5Th Floor, Jodhpur Cross Road Ahmedabad. Pan : Aavpp 9647 H Assessment Year : 2015-16 Smt.Rajshri Vastal Parikh Ito, Ward-5(2)(1) 501, Belvedere Flat Vs Ahmedabad. 5Th Floor, Jodhpur Cross Road Ahmedabad. Pan : Acypp 8836 H अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.N. Divetia, Advocate Revenue By : Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 03/02/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/02/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar: These Appeals Are Filed By Two Assessees Against Orders Of Even Dated I.E. 27.12.2018 Passed By Ld.Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-5, Ahmedabad [For Short “Ld.Cit(A)] Relating To The Assessment Year 2015-16. Since Common Issue Is Raised In Both The Appeals, We Dispose Of Them By This Common Order.
For Appellant: Shri S.N. Divetia, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr.DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 234BSection 54
capital gain and treated Rs.33 lakhs as income from other source.
ii) TDS U/s 194/A on Tulsi Bunglow was deducted
