BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 92Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai132Delhi64Kolkata20Bangalore17Chennai14Hyderabad10Jaipur7Indore5Surat4Pune4Ahmedabad3Panaji1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 10B3Section 56(2)(vii)3Section 92C2Section 143(3)2Section 144C2Transfer Pricing2Addition to Income2Comparables/TP2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. MYTRAH VAYU (GUJARAT) PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 690/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Prathvi Raj Meena, CIT.DRFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Bharadwaj V & Shri
Section 250Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)

capital work-in-progress. The above facts are not disputed. The transactions qualifying as SDT in law are listed in Section 92BA of the Act which is reproduced hereunder: “Meaning of specified domestic transaction. 92BA. For the purposes of this section and sections 92, 92C, 92D and 92E, "specified domestic transaction" in case of an assessee means

SKAPS INDUSTRIES INDIA PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 595/AHD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 May 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year: 2010-11

Section 10BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35DSection 35D(2)Section 43BSection 92Section 92C

capitalization for balance Rs.2,14,14,000/- (Rs. 2,96,92,435.00 - Rs.82,78,218.00). It be so held now. 2. Ld. CIT (A) erred in law and on facts in confirming disallowance of employees' contribution to provident fund of Rs.14,448/- u/s.43B of the Act. Assessment Year: 2010-11 Page 2 of 7 3. Ld. CIT (A) erred

HAZIRA PORT PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CICLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed on the above terms

ITA 265/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra & Shri Ankit SahniFor Respondent: Shri Prathvi Raj Meena, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144CSection 144C(3)Section 92C(3)

92C(3) which provides that the Learned TPO/AO can proceed to determine the arm's length price only in circumstances enumerated under clause (a) to (d) provided therein for the following transactions; • Provision of port facility services; • Repayment of unsecured Loan iii. Making several observations and findings which are based on an incorrect interpretation of law and without appreciating