BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 8Qclear

Sorted by relevance

Ahmedabad4Raipur3Delhi1

Key Topics

Section 80I5Section 1544Section 143(3)4Section 14A4Deduction4Section 271(1)(c)2Section 54F2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

DCIT CIRCLE-3(3), AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI ALPESHKUMAR C.PATEL, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1991/AHD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1908/Ahd/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2011-2012 Alpeshkumar C. Patel, A.C.I.T., 503, Milestone Building, Vs. Circle-3(3), Drive In Road, Ahmedabad. Thaltej, Ahmedabad-380052. Pan: Aeapp9489G

For Appellant: Shri Deepak R. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Pratap Singh CIT. D.R with Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.D.R
Section 41(1)Section 54F

capital gain in the event the assessee makes the sale of its bungalow in dispute. It is because the revenue has not doubted on the incurrence of such expenses while framing the assessment. Besides the above, all the necessary details of the construction expenses were made available to the authorities below along with the addresses and the payments were made

M/S. VAIBHAV CONSTRUCTION,ANAND vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1,, ANAND

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1597/AHD/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Oct 2019AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Shri Aseem L. Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri O.P. Sharma, CIT.DR &
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 80I

8Q-IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Deductions - Profits and gains from industrial undertakings other than infrastructure development undertakings - Assessment year 2004-05 - Whether it is area of plot, and not built up area, which is relevant for purpose of deciding eligibility of a project under section 80-IB (10) - Held, yes - Whether in case an assessee finds that

M/S. VAIBHAV CONSTRUCTION,ANAND vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1,, ANAND

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2692/AHD/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Oct 2019AY 2006-07
For Appellant: Shri Aseem L. Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri O.P. Sharma, CIT.DR &
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 80I

8Q-IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Deductions - Profits and gains from industrial undertakings other than infrastructure development undertakings - Assessment year 2004-05 - Whether it is area of plot, and not built up area, which is relevant for purpose of deciding eligibility of a project under section 80-IB (10) - Held, yes - Whether in case an assessee finds that

THE ACIT, CIRCLE2(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. KALTHIA ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2127/AHD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 2127/Ahd/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2014-2015 A.C.I.T., Kalthia Engineering & Construction Ltd., Circle-2(1)(2), Vs. 193, Kalthia House, Ahmedabad. Thaltej, Ahmedabad.

For Appellant: Shri Manish Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri D.B Gohil, Sr. D.R
Section 106Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

8Q-IA(1), deduction is given to eligible business and the same is defined in sub-section (4). Sub-section (2) provides option to the assessee to chose 10 consecutive assessment years out of 15 years. Option has to be exercised and if it is not exercised, the assessee not be getting the benefit. Fifteen years is outer limit