JCIT(OSD), CIR-3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD vs. RECKITT BENCKISER HEALTHCARE (INDIA) LTD, HARYANA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

capital gains tax by virtue of various clauses forming a part of Section 47 of the IT Act subjected to the applications of provisions of Section 2(19AA) of the Act. It is also settled position of law that the scheme of demerger once approved by the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court, it cannot be re-visited by any statutory

RAVINDRABHAI SHANKARBHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(5) NOW ITO, WARD-1(2)(2), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalthe Ito Ravindrabhai Shankarbhai Vs. Ward-1(2)(5). Patel Now Ito, Ward-1(2)(2) 86,Kanha Residency Vadodara – 390 007 Kalali Road, Kalali Ahmedabad – 390 012 [Pan : Aigpp 8415 M] (Appellant) (Respondent) .. Assessee Represented By : Ms. Urvashi Shodhan, Ar Revenue Represented By : Shri Abhijit, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 27/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 29/01/2026

section 54F were disallowed. As a result, the Assessing Officer computed the long-term capital gains at Rs.1,66,98,526/- as against Nil returned by the assessee and completed the assessment at a total income of Rs.1,75

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI KAILASH RAMAVATAR GOENKA, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

capital gains year-wise as computed and directed by the CIT(A). B. Grounds relating to Addition in respect of Internal Circulation of Funds and Unaccounted Receipts and Payments 15. The issue involved under these grounds pertain to unaccounted cash receipts and unaccounted cash payments, as reflected in the seized documents during the search operation. The AO made substantial additions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ROHITJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHAILESH SUBODHCHANDRA JHAVERI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for both the year under consideration

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

section 10(38) on sale of shares had rightly been disallowed. The ITAT made the following relevant observations, while dismissing the appeal of the assessee on this issue: Thus, the contention of the assessee that the transaction leading to long-term capital gains are supported by documents of sale and purchase, bank statement etc., cannot be accepted keeping in view

SHAILESH SUBODHCHANDRA JHAVERI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for both the year under consideration

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

section 10(38) on sale of shares had rightly been disallowed. The ITAT made the following relevant observations, while dismissing the appeal of the assessee on this issue: Thus, the contention of the assessee that the transaction leading to long-term capital gains are supported by documents of sale and purchase, bank statement etc., cannot be accepted keeping in view

SHAILESH S. JHAVERI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENT. CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for both the year under consideration

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

section 10(38) on sale of shares had rightly been disallowed. The ITAT made the following relevant observations, while dismissing the appeal of the assessee on this issue: Thus, the contention of the assessee that the transaction leading to long-term capital gains are supported by documents of sale and purchase, bank statement etc., cannot be accepted keeping in view

THE ACIT. CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDBAD vs. RAJENDRA HARJIVANDAS PRAJAPATI, AHMEDBAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

75 (Ahd.) on identical facts, it is held as under: The appellant sold property on 22.10.2007 and computed long-term capital gains. The section

RAJENDRA HARJIVANDAS PRAJAPATI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

75 (Ahd.) on identical facts, it is held as under: The appellant sold property on 22.10.2007 and computed long-term capital gains. The section

DCIE CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHEMDABAD, VEJALPUR vs. ERIS LIFESCIENCES LIMITED SHIVARTH AMBIT, BODAKDEV AHMEDABAD

In the result, for assessment year 2022-23, the appeal of the Department is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

capital gains have been credited to the profit and loss account prepared in accordance with the Companies Act. Once such gains form part of net profit, the computation of their quantum must necessarily follow the computation mechanism contained in section 48, which statutorily mandates indexation. Denial of indexation would artificially inflate book profit and result in MAT being levied