BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “capital gains”+ Section 54Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh52Mumbai36Delhi34Bangalore29Chennai14Pune12Kolkata10Karnataka10Ahmedabad8Jaipur8Hyderabad7Agra7SC6Indore6Rajkot4Guwahati3Telangana3Visakhapatnam2Calcutta2Jodhpur2Surat2Patna1Lucknow1Raipur1Cuttack1Cochin1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)12Section 26311Section 54G11Section 547Exemption7Section 271(1)(c)6Section 54F5Addition to Income5Deduction5Section 54B

DEVENDRA NARENDRABHAI THAKKER,,AHMEDABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 762/AHD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 762/Ahd/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12) Devendra Narendrabhai Acit, बनाम/ Thakker, Cir – 5(2), Vs. C/O Maffick Logistics, 228, Ahmedabad. Akshar Arcade, Opp. Memnagar Fire Station, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-14 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Abfpt 6354 E .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Jyotish M. Shah, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Prasoon Kabra, Sr.D.R.

For Appellant: Shri Jyotish M. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Prasoon Kabra, Sr.D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271Section 274Section 54E
4
Natural Justice3
Section 142(1)2
Section 54G

Section 54G. Capital gain of Rs.74,65,134/- was utilized for the purpose of new capital asset situated at Ahmedabad

SHRI KARAN RAJENDRAKUMAR ARYA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 31/AHD/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Sept 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 31/Ahd/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2015-2016 Shri Karan Rajendrakumar Arya, The Principal Commissioner Of 802, Saffron, Panchvati, Vs. Income Tax-1, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad.

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, CIT.D.R
Section 143(3)Section 54

capital gains. 12. Please furnish details along with documentary evidence in respect of deduction Claimed u/s. 54B, 54C, 54D, 54G and 54GA. b. Notice Dated 24-7-2017 File No.81 Date: 24/07/2017 Email mpjindal@rediffmail.com PAN: ADAPA3016D To, Shri karan Rajebndrakumar Arya, 802, Saffron Building, Panchavati, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad-380015. Sir, Sub: Limited Scrutiny asst. in your case for A.Y.2015-16, notice u/s.142

REJESHRI OMPRAKASH MALVIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(1)(1) (PREVIOUSLY WARD-4(1)(3)), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1053/AHD/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 10(37)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 54BSection 54G

54G & 54GA of the Act. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee has shown Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) of Rs.1,27,21,724/- on sale of land at Ratanpur and claimed the entire capital gain as exempt under Section

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-4, BARODA vs. THE SPUNPIPE & CONSTRUCTION CO. (BARODA) PVT. LTD., BARODA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 286/AHD/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Apr 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: Shri Saurabh Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 54G

capital gain of Rs.2,19,05,070 for Asstt.Year 2007-08 and Rs.32,08,825/- for the Asstt.Year 2009-10 from sale of factory land. Earlier the said land was taken on rent from 1945 and in the year 1994 the assessee purchased the same. The assessee claimed exemption under section 54G

RAMNIKLAL R BHADRA,AHMEDABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 67/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 54F

capital gain. 2. The learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts of the case in confirming action of the ld. A.O. in levying interest u/s.234A/B/C of the Act. 3. The learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts of the case in confirming action of the ld. A.O. in initiating penalty u/s.271

SAHEB INDUSTRIES,ANKLESHWAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1791/AHD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 40Section 54G

Section 54G of the Act. On examination of facts of assessee’s case, the Assessing Officer reworked the capital gains

BHOGILAL BHAILALBHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-1, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 613/AHD/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Nov 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 613/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16) बनाम/ Bhogilal Bhailalbhai The Pr. Commissioner Of Patel Income Tax-1 Vs. 475/2, Sagar Faliya, At & Vadodara Post Bhayali, Vadodara - 391410 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Bkkpp3136R (Appellant) .. (Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri Hemant Suthar, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Samir Tekriwal, Cit. Dr 19/11/2024 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 28/11/2024

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Suthar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Samir Tekriwal, CIT. DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54BSection 54F

Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee had filed the return of income for A.Y. 2015-16 on 31.08.2015 declaring total income of Rs.6,19,980/- and agricultural income of Rs. 1,94,450/-. The original assessment

MOHIT VIJAYKUMAR GUPTA,MUMBAI vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed, Ground No

ITA 1091/AHD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad06 Nov 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.1091/Ahd/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2021-22 Mohit Vijaykumar Gupta The Dcit बनाम/ B-1001, Juhu Trishul, Circle-2(1)(1) V/S. Gulmohar Cross Road No.6 Ahmedabad – 380 015 Jvpd Vile Parle West Mumbai – 400 049 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Adfpg 7162 D (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) ("" यथ"/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri J. C. Desai, Ca Revenue By : Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 06/08/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 06/11/2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per Siddhartha Nautiyal, Jm: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Dated 14/12/2025 Passed U/S.250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) For The Assessment Year (Ay) 2021-2022. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: Mohit Vijaykumar Gupta Vs. Dcit Asst. Year : 2021-22

For Appellant: Shri J. C. Desai, CAFor Respondent: Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr.DR
Section 22Section 23(1)(c)Section 24Section 250

sections 54, 54B, 54EC, 54EE, 54F, 54G, 54GA and 54GB of the Act. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer passed an order assessing the total income at ₹11,02,69,810/– as against the returned income of Mohit Vijaykumar Gupta vs. DCIT Asst. Year : 2021-22 3 ₹10,60,37,350/–. The additions made