BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 53Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore117Mumbai113Delhi88Hyderabad69Chennai49Kolkata25Pune20Patna16Visakhapatnam9Karnataka6Chandigarh6Ahmedabad5Nagpur4Surat4Indore4Lucknow4Cochin4Jaipur2Calcutta2Telangana2Rajkot1SC1Kerala1Cuttack1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)6Section 2635Long Term Capital Gains4Addition to Income4Section 2(47)3Section 1472Section 14A2Section 53A2Section 55A2

ARUNABEN KAUSHIKKUMAR PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the order of ld

ITA 2383/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Or During The Course Of The Appellate Proceedings.”

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr. D.R

capital gains tax was offered by Mr. Ganpatbhai Patel on the sale transaction claimed to be entered through Banakhat in the year 2000. The father of the assessee, Mr. Ganpatbhai Patel admittedly received a sum of Rs. 53,26,000/- in cash, but there is nothing on record to show that the possession in the afore-said was transferred

THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SMT. ARUNABEN KAUSHIKKUMAR PATEL,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the order of ld

ITA 2485/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Or During The Course Of The Appellate Proceedings.”

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr. D.R

capital gains tax was offered by Mr. Ganpatbhai Patel on the sale transaction claimed to be entered through Banakhat in the year 2000. The father of the assessee, Mr. Ganpatbhai Patel admittedly received a sum of Rs. 53,26,000/- in cash, but there is nothing on record to show that the possession in the afore-said was transferred

THE ITO, WARD-3(2)(7),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI GAUTAMBHAI BABARBHAI PATEL,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1807/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad06 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year : 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, Shri Gautambhai Babarbhai Patel, Ward 3(2)(7), Vs 1, Laxmikunj Society, Isanpur Ahmedabad Vatva Road, Isanpur, Ahmedabad-382 443 Pan : Aknpp 4848 G अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ankit Talsania, Ar Revenue By : Shri S.S. Shukla, Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 29/03/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 06/04/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per P.M. Jagtap, Vice-:

For Appellant: Shri Ankit Talsania, ARFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Shukla, DR
Section 55A

Gain arising from the sale of agricultural land, a deduction of Rs.86,50,005/- was claimed by the assessee under Section 54B of the Act for the investment made in purchase of two new agricultural lands. In this regard, it was noted by the Assessing Officer that his agricultural land was transferred by the assessee on 13.06.2011 while

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(5),, AHMEDABAD vs. SMT. KAVITA V. ADANI, AHMEDABAD

Appeal are allowed

ITA 18/AHD/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 May 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Biren Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 2(14)Section 2(47)Section 263Section 53ASection 63

53A of T.P. Act, 1882, read with section 2(47) of the Income tax Act, 1961 can be invoked? 5. Whether the gain offered for tax unlawfully by the assessee on transfer of agricultural land not being a capital

ADINATH LEASING AND FINANCE P LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1065/AHD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Memebr & Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Sakar Sharma, A.RFor Respondent: 08/07/2022
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 14ASection 2(47)Section 53A

53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Such conclusion was derived on the ground that banakhat dated 16.03.2009 entered by assessee to ITA No. 1065/Ahd/2017 [Adinath Leasing And Finance P. Ltd. Vs. ITO] A.Y. 2010-11 - 3 - acquire the property as well as possession agreement were simply on stamp paper of Rs. 100/- and were not registered. Therefore, loss