SOHAM NITINBHAI BHADIYADRA,BOTAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1), BHAVNAGAR
In the result, the appeal of the asses is partly allowed
ITA 127/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Jul 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year 2018-19
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Chand Meena, Sr. D.R
Section 148Section 250(4)Section 45ASection 69A
45A. However, Ld. CIT Appeals without considering the same or without asking for any other derails upholds the decision of Ld.
AO by mentioning that “since no documentary proof is produced by assessee in support of business it would be fair and reasonable to make 8% of each deposit which comes to Rs. 5,53,728/-”.
2. Ld. CIT Appeal
