BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 36(1)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai216Bangalore60Delhi54Chandigarh51Chennai44Cochin23Hyderabad14Pune14Jaipur10Cuttack8Indore8Surat8Visakhapatnam8Kolkata7Ahmedabad5Rajkot4Nagpur4SC3Karnataka3Kerala1Lucknow1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 14A7Section 43B6Section 143(3)5Section 50C4Section 40A(3)4Disallowance4Addition to Income4Section 56(2)(vii)3Section 54B3

NUTAN NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1023/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Nov 2025AY 2020-21
For Appellant: \nShri Bandish Soparkar, ARFor Respondent: \nShri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 10(15)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 263Section 28Section 36(1)(viia)

1)(viia) of the Act on the entire income of\n₹17,55,97,752/-, even though this income consisted of capital gains of\n₹6,36,76,032/- which does not fall under the head “Profits and Gains of\nBusiness or Profession.” The Principal CIT observed that section

Section 36(1)(viia)3
Deduction3
Depreciation2

VISHNUBHAI MAFATBHAI DESAI,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(4),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2849/AHD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2849/Ahd/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri S. V. Agrawal, A.R
Section 2(14)Section 49(4)Section 50CSection 54BSection 56Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)

1) learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming addition of Rs.9,50,946 made by A.O. u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of Act in as much as, (i) The agri. Lands purchased are rural lands & not capital assets u/s. 2(14) of Act, therefore provision of section 50C are not applicable whereby provision of section

GUJARAT INFRAPIPES PVT. LTD.,,VADODARA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 813/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT-DR and Shri Ashok Kumar Suthar, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)Section 43BSection 50C

36(1)(iii) of the Act and we hereby delete the same. In the result, Ground No.5 of the appeal is allowed. 9. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed. 10. Now, we take up ITA No. 987/Ahd/2017 (Department’s appeal). The Grounds of Appeal raised by the Revenue are as follows: 1

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, VADODARA vs. M/S. GUJARAT INFRA PIPES PVT. LTD.,, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 987/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT-DR and Shri Ashok Kumar Suthar, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)Section 43BSection 50C

36(1)(iii) of the Act and we hereby delete the same. In the result, Ground No.5 of the appeal is allowed. 9. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed. 10. Now, we take up ITA No. 987/Ahd/2017 (Department’s appeal). The Grounds of Appeal raised by the Revenue are as follows: 1

AXIS BANK LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1 NOW CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 311/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Oct 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedsl. Ita No(S) Asset. Appeal(S) By No(S) Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 311/Ahd/2016 2010-11 Axis Bank Limited, D.C.I.T., “Trishul”, 3Rd Floor, Circle-1(1)(1) Opp. Samtheshwar Ahmedabad. Mahadev Near Law Garden, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad-380006. Pan: Aaacu2414K 2. 2176/Ahd/2016 2011-12 Axis Bank Limited, D.C.I.T., “Trishul”, 3Rd Floor, Circle-1(1)(1) Opp. Samtheshwar Ahmedabad. Mahadev Near Law Garden, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad-380006. Pan: Aaacu2414K 3. 2173/Ahd/2016 2011-12 D.C.I.T., Axis Bank Limited, Circle-1(1)(1) Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad. Pan: Aaacu2414K 4. 165/Ahd/2017 2012-13 Axis Bank Limited, D.C.I.T., Ahmedabad. Circle-1(1)(1) Ahmedabad. Pan: Aaacu2414K 5. 287/Ahd/2017 2012-13 D.C.I.T., Axis Bank Limited, Circle-1(1)(1) Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad. Pan: Aaacu2414K 6-7 520 & 2013-14 Axis Bank Limited, D.C.I.T., 521/Ahd/2018 & Ahmedabad. Circle-1(1)(1) 2014-15 Ahmedabad. Pan: Aaacu2414K 8-9 604 & 605/ 2013-14 D.C.I.T., Axis Bank Limited, Ahd/2018 & Circle-1(1)(1) Ahmedabad. 2014-15 Ahmedabad. Pan: Aaacu2414K

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Smt. Urvashi Shodhan, and Shri Parin Shah,For Respondent: Shri Anshu Prakash, CIT.DR
Section 14A

36(l)(viia). 3.9 It is further submitted that this addition is only timing difference based addition, tax- neutral over two years and hence ought to be cancelled in view of Hon. SC judgement in the case of Excel Industries Limited 358 ITR 295 (SC), since the Bank has already recognized and offered to tox/consider the same during