BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 35Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi60Mumbai40Bangalore17Chennai15Ahmedabad5Hyderabad4SC3Chandigarh3Pune3Kolkata2Karnataka2Dehradun2Cochin2Visakhapatnam1Jaipur1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 8010Section 143(3)5Section 80P(2)(iv)4Deduction3Addition to Income3Section 143(2)2Section 80P2Section 292B2Disallowance2

PRABODH MOHANLAL SHAH,VADODARA vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INTL. TAXATION, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 331/AHD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 288Section 292BSection 54

section 144C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to the Asst. Year 2018-19. I.T.A No. 331/Ahd/2022 A.Y. 2018-19 Page No 2 Prabodh Mohanlal Shah vs. ACIT 2. Brief facts of the case is that the assessee is a Non Resident Indian residing in United States of America has shown Long Term Capital Gain of Rs.56

BARODA DIST. CO.OP. MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(2),, BARODA

Transfer Pricing2

In the result assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 3283/AHD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Manish Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Santosh Karnani, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(iv)

capital and reserves and surplus of Rs.26,23,59,906/-. The learned AO has not found any investment made out of loan/borrowed funds. Reliance is placed on the decisions of the B'Bay high court in income- tax appeal No. 1398 of 2008 in the case of C.I.T v/s. Reliance Utilities & power Ltd. holding presumption that "if there are funds

BARODA DIST. CO.OP. MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(2),, BARODA

In the result assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 3282/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Manish Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Santosh Karnani, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(iv)

capital and reserves and surplus of Rs.26,23,59,906/-. The learned AO has not found any investment made out of loan/borrowed funds. Reliance is placed on the decisions of the B'Bay high court in income- tax appeal No. 1398 of 2008 in the case of C.I.T v/s. Reliance Utilities & power Ltd. holding presumption that "if there are funds

CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal for the assessment year 2013-14 is also partly allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 954/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2021AY 2012-13
Section 143(3)

Section 90(2), where there is a DTAA between India and any country outside India, the more favourable of the two provisions, viz., under the DTAA or under the I.T. Act, are to be applied in case of the assessee. However, in my view, the point as to whether the payments are in the nature of fees for technical services

CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal for the assessment year 2013-14 is also partly allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 213/AHD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2021AY 2013-14
Section 143(3)

Section 90(2), where there is a DTAA between India and any country outside India, the more favourable of the two provisions, viz., under the DTAA or under the I.T. Act, are to be applied in case of the assessee. However, in my view, the point as to whether the payments are in the nature of fees for technical services