Search: capital gains | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 272A(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai61 Delhi25 Mumbai17 Surat14 Bangalore14 Kolkata13 Jaipur3 Ahmedabad3 Chandigarh3 Agra3 SC2 Lucknow1 Pune1 Indore1

Key Topics

Section 1474 Section 272A(1)(d)4 Section 54G2 Section 142(1)2 Section 273B2 Section 143(3)2 Penalty2 Addition to Income2 Natural Justice2

MANISHKUMAR RAMLAKHAN AGRAWAL,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OOFICER, WARD 6(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 920/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajenkumar M Vasavda, Sr. DR

Section 10(38)Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 271A(1)(d)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 273B

E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”), National Faceless Appeal Centre (in short “NFAC”), Delhi vide order dated 17.04.2025 passed for A.Y. 2018-19. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal

TRUSHA VRAJENDRA SANGHAVI,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 5(3)(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2455/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Tr Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Years:2018-19

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 234ASection 250(6)Section 270ASection 272A(1)(d)

2. In the facts of the present case, Ld. AO was not justified in reopening the assessment under section 147 of the Act. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred, both in law and on facts, in confirming the addition of Rs.51,50,000/- made by Ld. AO in respect of Long Term Capital Gain on sale of property

SAHEB INDUSTRIES,ANKLESHWAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1791/AHD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT-DR

Section 142(1)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 40Section 54G

E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”), National Faceless Appeal Centre (in short “NFAC”), Delhi vide order dated 25.10.2023 passed for A.Y. 2017-18. 2. The assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal