G. B. BUILDERS, ,AHMEDABAD vs. ACIT-CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 626/AHD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Apr 2022AY 2015-16
Bench: Due Date On 24-11-2014, But Inadvertently Committed An Error Therein Of Depositing This Tds Using Pan Of The Seller Instead Of Pan Of The Appellant (As The Buyer)
For Appellant: Shri Hirak Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr. D.R
Section 194Section 194ISection 200Section 200ASection 234E
section 234E of the Act. …….
27. counsel for the petitioner however, referred to the decision of Supreme Court in case of CIT v. B. C. Srinivasa Setty [1981] 128 ITR
294/5 Taxman 1 (SC), to contended that when a machinery provision is not provided, the levy itself would fail. The decision of Supreme
Court in case of B C Srinivasa