MAYANK RASIKLAL PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CPC , BENGLURU
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes
ITA 151/AHD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Jul 2022AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 151/Ahd/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2017-2018 Mayank Rasiklal Patel, The D.C.I.T., 3 Jagjivan Park Socieity, Vs. Cpc, Auda Garden, Bengaluru. Near Ishwer Bhuvan, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-382445. Pan: Afxpp7715H
For Appellant: Shri S.N. Divatia, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr. DR
Section 115VSection 143Section 143(1)Section 144Section 144BSection 154Section 200ASection 206CSection 246A
capital gain, other sources and profit share from the said firm. The assessee in the year under consideration declared income of Rs. 39,85,850/- only. While processing the return of income under section 143(1), the CPC Bengaluru made an addition of Rs.
15,85,364/- on account of difference in interest income as per form 26AS
