BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 153Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi220Mumbai70Bangalore69Chennai63Cochin57Jaipur33Chandigarh25Hyderabad25Nagpur23Lucknow14Pune8Guwahati6Indore5Ahmedabad4Kolkata4Karnataka3Amritsar3Raipur3Rajkot1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 133A4Section 1324Section 143(3)3Addition to Income3Section 2632Section 153C2Section 133(6)2Section 1312Survey u/s 133A2

SMT. SWATIBEN ANILBHAI SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1513/AHD/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jan 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri Ketan H. Shah with ShriFor Respondent: ITA Nos. 1513 to 1515/Ahd/19
Section 143(3)

Section 153D of the Act, the learned DR pointed out that in the first round of the substantive assessment proceedings under s.143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Act, the approval of designated authority under s. 153D of the Act was duly taken. However, in the ITA Nos. 1513 to 1515/Ahd/19 [Swatiben A. Shah & Anr.] - 8 - absence of any reference made

ACIT CC 2(3) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. AISHA DHIRAJ GOGIA, AHMEDABAD

In the result: 50. To summarize the final outcome:

Undisclosed Income2
Revision u/s 2632
ITA 1673/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed
ITAT Ahmedabad
28 Nov 2025
AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha["ी संजय गग", "ाियक सद" एवं "ी नरे" साद िस!ा, लेखा सद" के सम#।]

Capital Gain under section 45 of the Act being sale consideration and hence provisions of section 69A rws 115BBE of the Act cannot be invoked. “ 43. Factual Matrix and Lower Authorities' Findings: 43.1. The brief facts of the case are that during the course of search action, an Agreement to Sell for a bungalow in the "Earth Erita" project

RAJESH BALVANTRAI BRAHMBHATT,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT(CENTRAL), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1158/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

Section 131Section 132Section 133(6)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

Capital Gain, which was accepted by the AO. Further, no revenue loss has occurred as the income would have been taxed at the same rate irrespective of the head of income under which it was offered." 5. The appellant humbly submit that the Ld. AO has conducted a detailed and thorough inquiry under Section 142(1) before passing the assessment

RAJESH BALVANTRAI BRAHMBHATT,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT(CENTRAL), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1157/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

Section 131Section 132Section 133(6)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153CSection 263

Capital Gain, which was accepted by the AO. Further, no revenue loss has occurred as the income would have been taxed at the same rate irrespective of the head of income under which it was offered." 5. The appellant humbly submit that the Ld. AO has conducted a detailed and thorough inquiry under Section 142(1) before passing the assessment