BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

221 results for “capital gains”+ Section 151clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai842Delhi811Jaipur314Bangalore232Ahmedabad221Chennai217Chandigarh149Hyderabad141Karnataka124Kolkata119Pune97Indore85Cochin82Visakhapatnam56Guwahati56Raipur51Calcutta51Nagpur51Rajkot41Lucknow35Surat33Panaji31Cuttack29Amritsar24Agra20Ranchi15Jodhpur10Patna10Telangana9Jabalpur7SC7Rajasthan4Allahabad4Orissa3Dehradun2Varanasi2Kerala1Gauhati1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 14759Addition to Income53Section 14A52Section 143(3)50Section 26347Section 14838Disallowance35Section 13230Section 2(15)26

GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 117/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

151. ITA No.1379 and 1380/Ahd/2009 and 13 Others Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. Vs. ACIT 17. With the assistance of the ld.representatives, we have gone through the record. The issue whether gain from sale of shares/mutual funds is to be assessed as business income or short term capital gain/long term capital gain, is a highly debatable issue. It always puzzled the adjudicator

GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMEICALS LTD,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

Showing 1–20 of 221 · Page 1 of 12

...
Penalty20
Section 153C18
Reopening of Assessment16
ITA 135/AHD/2015[2008-09]Status: Disposed
ITAT Ahmedabad
28 Jun 2019
AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

151. ITA No.1379 and 1380/Ahd/2009 and 13 Others Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. Vs. ACIT 17. With the assistance of the ld.representatives, we have gone through the record. The issue whether gain from sale of shares/mutual funds is to be assessed as business income or short term capital gain/long term capital gain, is a highly debatable issue. It always puzzled the adjudicator

THA ADDL. CIT, RANGE-1,, BARODA vs. M/S. GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED.,, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 106/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

151. ITA No.1379 and 1380/Ahd/2009 and 13 Others Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. Vs. ACIT 17. With the assistance of the ld.representatives, we have gone through the record. The issue whether gain from sale of shares/mutual funds is to be assessed as business income or short term capital gain/long term capital gain, is a highly debatable issue. It always puzzled the adjudicator

THE ADDL.CIT, RANGE-1, BARODA vs. GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMEICALS LTD, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 548/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

151. ITA No.1379 and 1380/Ahd/2009 and 13 Others Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. Vs. ACIT 17. With the assistance of the ld.representatives, we have gone through the record. The issue whether gain from sale of shares/mutual funds is to be assessed as business income or short term capital gain/long term capital gain, is a highly debatable issue. It always puzzled the adjudicator

GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2365/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

151. ITA No.1379 and 1380/Ahd/2009 and 13 Others Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. Vs. ACIT 17. With the assistance of the ld.representatives, we have gone through the record. The issue whether gain from sale of shares/mutual funds is to be assessed as business income or short term capital gain/long term capital gain, is a highly debatable issue. It always puzzled the adjudicator

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA vs. GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LTD.,, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2546/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

151. ITA No.1379 and 1380/Ahd/2009 and 13 Others Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. Vs. ACIT 17. With the assistance of the ld.representatives, we have gone through the record. The issue whether gain from sale of shares/mutual funds is to be assessed as business income or short term capital gain/long term capital gain, is a highly debatable issue. It always puzzled the adjudicator

GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE ADDL. CIT, RANGE-1,, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 116/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

151. ITA No.1379 and 1380/Ahd/2009 and 13 Others Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. Vs. ACIT 17. With the assistance of the ld.representatives, we have gone through the record. The issue whether gain from sale of shares/mutual funds is to be assessed as business income or short term capital gain/long term capital gain, is a highly debatable issue. It always puzzled the adjudicator

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2),, BARODA vs. M/S. PRATHAM INVESTMENTS,, BARODA

ITA 742/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jan 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 742/Ahd/2015, 3078 & 3077/Ahd/2016 With Cross Objection No. 76/Ahd/2015 & 9/Ahd/2017 & I.T.A. No. 3087/Ahd/2016 (In I.T.A. Nos. 742/Ahd/2015, 3078 & 3077/Ahd/2016) & ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14)

For Respondent: Shri Mudit Nagpal, Sr. D.R

section the profits or gains arising from the transfer by way of conversion by the owner of a capital asset into or its treatment by him as stock-in- trade of a business carried on by him, shall be chargeable to tax as the income from the previous year in which such stock-in-rade is sold or otherwise transferred

M/S. PRATHAM DEVELOPERS,,VADODARA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, BARODA

In the result, Ground No.4 of the assessee’s appeal is allowed in part

ITA 3087/AHD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jan 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 742/Ahd/2015, 3078 & 3077/Ahd/2016 With Cross Objection No. 76/Ahd/2015 & 9/Ahd/2017 & I.T.A. No. 3087/Ahd/2016 (In I.T.A. Nos. 742/Ahd/2015, 3078 & 3077/Ahd/2016) & ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14)

For Respondent: Shri Mudit Nagpal, Sr. D.R

section the profits or gains arising from the transfer by way of conversion by the owner of a capital asset into or its treatment by him as stock-in- trade of a business carried on by him, shall be chargeable to tax as the income from the previous year in which such stock-in-rade is sold or otherwise transferred

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(3), AHMEDABAD vs. EDELWEISS FINANCIAL ADVISORS LTD., ( FORMERLY KNOWN ANAGRAM STOCK BROKING LTD.,), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 445/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Justice P.P. Bhatt, Hon’Ble & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Dileep Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32Section 36Section 36(2)Section 37Section 48Section 73

Capital expenditures are often employed to improve operational efficiency, increase revenue in the long term, or make improvements to the existing assets of a company. Capital spending is different from other types of spending that focus on short-term operating expenses, such as overhead expenses or payments to suppliers and creditors. 115.2 Depreciation is used to expense the fixed asset

M/S. EDELWEISS BROKING LTD. ( AMALGAMATING COMPANY EDELWEISS FINANCIAL ADVISORS LTD.),AHMEDABAD vs. THE JT. CIT, RANGE-3,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 318/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Justice P.P. Bhatt, Hon’Ble & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Dileep Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32Section 36Section 36(2)Section 37Section 48Section 73

Capital expenditures are often employed to improve operational efficiency, increase revenue in the long term, or make improvements to the existing assets of a company. Capital spending is different from other types of spending that focus on short-term operating expenses, such as overhead expenses or payments to suppliers and creditors. 115.2 Depreciation is used to expense the fixed asset

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(3), AHMEDABAD vs. EDELWEISS BROKING LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 446/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Justice P.P. Bhatt, Hon’Ble & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Dileep Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32Section 36Section 36(2)Section 37Section 48Section 73

Capital expenditures are often employed to improve operational efficiency, increase revenue in the long term, or make improvements to the existing assets of a company. Capital spending is different from other types of spending that focus on short-term operating expenses, such as overhead expenses or payments to suppliers and creditors. 115.2 Depreciation is used to expense the fixed asset

DALPAT BARAIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 1692/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 54B

capital gain of Rs.12,97,910/-. The assessee was issued with 148 notice dated 27-08-2022 for the Asst. Year 2016-17 after getting approval from Ld. PCIT on 23-08-2022 which is more than three years from the end of the relevant assessment year. As per Section 151

THAKORBHAI MAGANBHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD- 3(1)(1), VADODARA

ITA 532/AHD/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Dec 2025AY 2008-09
For Appellant: \nShri Sakar Sharma, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kamal Deep Singh, Sr. DR
Section 131Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

capital gain and determination of cost of\nacquisition, while confirming the reassessment proceedings and major\nadditions made by the Assessing Officer.\n6. The assessee is in appeal before us against the order passed by\nCIT(Appeals) dismissing the appeal of the assessee. The assessee has raised\nthe following Grounds of Appeal before us:\n“1. The Ld. CIT(A)-NFAC

STERLING ADDLIFE INDIA PRIVATE LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. PR. CIT-4,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 967/AHD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Mar 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.967/Ahd/2018 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2013-14) बनाम/ Sterling Addlife India The Pr.Cit-4 Pvt.Ltd. Ahmedabad Vs. Sterling Hospital Buildings Off Gurukul Road Memnagar Ahmedabad-380 052 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aadca 0897 M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Dinal Shah & A.C.Shah, Ars ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Mahesh Shah, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing 28/01/2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement 27/03/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed: The Captioned Appeal Has Been Filed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax–4, Ahmedabad [Cit In Short] Dated 28/03/2018 Relevant To Assessment Year (Ay) 2013-14. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:-

For Appellant: Shri Dinal Shah & A.C.Shah, ArsFor Respondent: Shri Mahesh Shah, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

capital gain is properly worked out since the premium is paid to the government as per Clause No. 11 of agreement to sale. So far as the payment is concerned, the AO has examined the payment properly and satisfied about the same and therefore he has allowed the deduction. The premium is paid as per Clause No. 11 of agreement

SHRI NAVINCHANDRA N. PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 869/AHD/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri R.N. Dzouza, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 14ASection 234BSection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 45(2)Section 69

capital gain. (ii) Scrutiny of records, it was noticed from the assets of the balance sheet for AY 2012- 13 that there was an agricultural land amounting to Rs. 1.73,25,167 (including land purchased during the year R.S. no. 665/P/l for Rs. 15.54,000) under the head investment. However, the balance sheet of the previous 'year

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-7,, AHMEDABAD vs. SMT. USHABEN P. MEHTA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessees are allowed consequently the Revenue appeals are dismissed

ITA 1856/AHD/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jul 2022AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar &For Respondent: Shri Ajai Pratap Singh, CIT/DR. &
Section 112Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234B

capital gains". In view of the above, I have reason to believe that the income has escaped assessment and therefore this proposal. (RANJIT SAH) Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(2), Ahmedabad 5.1. The assessee counsel also taken us through the paper book wherein an approval u/s. 151 of the Act is given by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Range

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(5),, AHMEDABAD vs. SMT. SONAL D. MEHTA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessees are allowed consequently the Revenue appeals are dismissed

ITA 2792/AHD/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jul 2022AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar &For Respondent: Shri Ajai Pratap Singh, CIT/DR. &
Section 112Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234B

capital gains". In view of the above, I have reason to believe that the income has escaped assessment and therefore this proposal. (RANJIT SAH) Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(2), Ahmedabad 5.1. The assessee counsel also taken us through the paper book wherein an approval u/s. 151 of the Act is given by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Range

SMT. RAKSHABEN S. MEHTA,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(2), ( ERSTWHILE ACIT, CIRCLE-7),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessees are allowed consequently the Revenue appeals are dismissed

ITA 1398/AHD/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jul 2022AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar &For Respondent: Shri Ajai Pratap Singh, CIT/DR. &
Section 112Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234B

capital gains". In view of the above, I have reason to believe that the income has escaped assessment and therefore this proposal. (RANJIT SAH) Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(2), Ahmedabad 5.1. The assessee counsel also taken us through the paper book wherein an approval u/s. 151 of the Act is given by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Range

SMT. SONAL D. MEHTA,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(5), (ERSTWHILE ACIT, CIRCLE-7),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessees are allowed consequently the Revenue appeals are dismissed

ITA 1347/AHD/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jul 2022AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar &For Respondent: Shri Ajai Pratap Singh, CIT/DR. &
Section 112Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234B

capital gains". In view of the above, I have reason to believe that the income has escaped assessment and therefore this proposal. (RANJIT SAH) Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(2), Ahmedabad 5.1. The assessee counsel also taken us through the paper book wherein an approval u/s. 151 of the Act is given by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Range