SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ASHOKJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

SHRI ROHITJI CHANDUJI THAKOR,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 131 of the post-search inquiry. On the other hand, the ld.CIT-DR also relied upon the assessment order, and submitted that evidence during the course of search duly seized exhibiting the earning of short term capital gain by the assessee on the land transactions comprised at block no.77 and 76. 19. We have duly considered rival submissions

AJAY REGHUBHAI BHARWAD,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(1), VADODARA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessees are dismissed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

section 45(1) of the act, any profits or gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset effected in the previous year I.T.A No. 595, 596 & 597/Ahd/2020 A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2010-11 Page No 10 Shri Piyush M. Dobariya vs. ITO & Ors. shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head "Capital gains" with certain conditions and exemptions

SHRI PIYUSH M DOBARIYA,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-5(4), VADODARA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessees are dismissed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

section 45(1) of the act, any profits or gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset effected in the previous year I.T.A No. 595, 596 & 597/Ahd/2020 A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2010-11 Page No 10 Shri Piyush M. Dobariya vs. ITO & Ors. shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head "Capital gains" with certain conditions and exemptions

SHRI AJAY REGHUBHAI BHARWAD,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-2(1), VADODARA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessees are dismissed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

section 45(1) of the act, any profits or gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset effected in the previous year I.T.A No. 595, 596 & 597/Ahd/2020 A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2010-11 Page No 10 Shri Piyush M. Dobariya vs. ITO & Ors. shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head "Capital gains" with certain conditions and exemptions

HARSHADKUMAR HARGOVANDAS PATEL,KALOL vs. THE ITO, WARD-4, MEHSANA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

1,48,61,085/- made by the\nAssessing Officer towards Long-Term Capital Gain by rejecting the valuation\nreport of a registered valuer without making a mandatory reference to the\nDepartmental Valuation Officer (DVO) under section 55A of the Act. It was\nsubmitted that the assessee had sold land during the relevant assessment year\nand, for the purpose of computing

THAKORBHAI MAGANBHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD- 3(1)(1), VADODARA

131 of the Act\nadmitting receipt of cash on sale of land, the Assessing Officer reopened the\nassessment by issuing notice under section 148 dated 27.03.2015 after\nobtaining approval from the competent authority. During reassessment\nproceedings, the Assessing Officer issued several notices under section\n142(1) of the Act calling for details regarding the nature of land, distance\nfrom municipal

RAJESH BALVANTRAI BRAHMBHATT,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT(CENTRAL), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

Capital Gain, which was accepted by the AO. Further, no revenue loss has occurred as the income would have been taxed at the same rate irrespective of the head of income under which it was offered." 5. The appellant humbly submit that the Ld. AO has conducted a detailed and thorough inquiry under Section 142(1) before passing the assessment

RAJESH BALVANTRAI BRAHMBHATT,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT(CENTRAL), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

Capital Gain, which was accepted by the AO. Further, no revenue loss has occurred as the income would have been taxed at the same rate irrespective of the head of income under which it was offered." 5. The appellant humbly submit that the Ld. AO has conducted a detailed and thorough inquiry under Section 142(1) before passing the assessment

RAJESH BALVANTRAI BRAHMBHATT,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT(CENTRAL), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is allowed

1) of the Act.\n3. The Ld. PCIT failed to consider that the appellant's statement\nunder Section 131 was recorded on 13.02.2019, before the end\nof FY 2018-19 and before the due date for filing the return for AY\n2019-20. Therefore, the income of Rs.2.30 crore disclosed in the\nreturn cannot be treated as \"undisclosed\" or \"unaccounted

RAJESH BALVANTRAI BRAHMBHATT,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT(CENTRAL), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is allowed

1) of the Act.\n3. The Ld. PCIT failed to consider that the appellant's statement\nunder Section 131 was recorded on 13.02.2019, before the end\nof FY 2018-19 and before the due date for filing the return for AY\n2019-20. Therefore, the income of Rs.2.30 crore disclosed in the\nreturn cannot be treated as \"undisclosed\" or \"unaccounted

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT vs. BHAVESHKUMAR GIRISHBHAI BHANDARI, AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT

Appeal is allowed in ITA 978/Ahd/2025 and ITA\n978/Ahd/2025 as well

gains. The assessee failed to discharge the onus under Section 68 to prove the genuineness of the steep rise in share prices and the transactions.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "68", "10(38)", "115BBE", "271AAC", "143(1)", "143(3)", "144B", "37(1)", "147", "132", "132(4)", "131", "10(38)", "250" ], "issues": "Whether the Long-Term Capital

SHRI NAGIN A VAGHELA,VADODARA vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for A

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyali.T(Ss).A. Nos.449/Ahd/2019 & 44/Ahd/2020 (A.Ys.: 2011-12 & 2012-13) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Shri Nagin A. Vaghela, Tax, 11, Purva Bunglow, Nr. Central Circle-3, Manglam Duple, Sama, Vadodara Vadodara [Pan No.Aakpw5302R] (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

131 dated October 13, 2015. The assessee also failed to attend the hearing scheduled for December 28, 2015, in response to another notice under section 142(1). Therefore, the Assessing Officer, on the basis of AIRs, questioned the assessee about the purchase and sale of immovable property during A.Y. 2011-12, but no response was provided. The Assessing Officer noted