BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “capital gains”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai71Jaipur40Panaji29Hyderabad27Delhi23Bangalore17Mumbai17Visakhapatnam13Ahmedabad12Kolkata8Pune8Lucknow7Agra6Rajkot5Cuttack5Surat4Amritsar3Indore3Jodhpur3Raipur3Dehradun2Chandigarh2Cochin1Patna1

Key Topics

Demonetization10Addition to Income10Cash Deposit9Section 69A7Section 54F6Section 1476Section 10(38)6Section 142(1)5Section 1485Section 153A

HIRAL TAPANKUMAR CHUDGAR,VADODARA, GUJARAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3)(1), VADODARA, VADODARA, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 44/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

Section 10(38)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 69Section 69A

Capital Gain of Rs. 29,55,558/- and claimed exemption u/s 10(38) of the Act. Thus the income chargeable to tax of Rs.29,55,558/- for the Asst. Year 2017- 18 has escaped assessment within the meaning of Section 147 of the Act and show cause notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act was issued

4
Section 158B4
Unexplained Investment4

HIRAL TAPANKUMAR CHUDGAR,VADODARA, GUJARAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3)(1), VADODARA, VADODARA, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 43/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member And\nShri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar, Accountant Member\nITA Nos 43 & 44/Ahd/2025\nAssessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19\nHiral Tapankumar\nChudgar\n201/A, Premdarshan,\nBehind Jay Ambe School,\nSamasavli Raod, Vemali,\nVadodara-390008,\nGujarat\nPAN: ANCPC4000H\n(Appellant)\nIncome Tax Officer\nWard-1(3)(1),\nVs Vadodara\n(Respondent)\nAssessee Represented:\nShri Deepak Shah, A.R.\nRevenue Represented:\nShri Abhijit, Sr.D.R.\nDate of hearing\n: 18-06-

Section 10(38)Section 115BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 69Section 69A

Capital Gain of Rs.\n29,55,558/- and claimed exemption u/s 10(38) of the Act. Thus the\nincome chargeable to tax of Rs.29,55,558/- for the Asst. Year 2017-\n18 has escaped assessment within the meaning of Section 147 of\nthe Act and show cause notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act was issued

INCOMETAX OFFICER WARD-3(3)(1),AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. HARESH DAYASHANKAR SHRIVASTAV, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 684/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarassessment Year : 2017-18 Income-Tax Officer, Haresh Dayashankar Shrivastav, Vs Ward 3(3)(1), 35, Swetanjali Society, Nr. Ahmedabad Hasubhai Park, Satellite, Ahmedabad-380015 Pan : Bbpps 5719 B अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Arsh Shaikh, Ar Revenue By : Shri Abhijit, Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 25.06.2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.07.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar:

For Appellant: Shri Arsh Shaikh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit, Sr DR
Section 142(1)Section 144

demonetization period. Further there was credit entries reflected in his bank account of Rs.69,98,368/- and the assessee sold an immovable property on 04.06.2016 for a consideration of Rs.1 crore, ITO Vs. Haresh Dayashankar Shrivastav AY : 2017-18 2 but the assessee has not offered capital gains

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. REKHA INDRAVADAN CHOKSHI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 287/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

Section 133(6)

capital gain was a genuine transaction. The assessee failed to justify manifold increase in the prices of the shares despite weak financials of the companies. Initial investment in the company of unknown credential and subsequent jump in the share prices of such a company, cannot be an accident or windfall but could be possible, because of manipulation in the share

REKHABEN INDRAVADAN CHOKSHI,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-5(2)(4), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 270/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

Section 133(6)

capital gain was a genuine transaction. The assessee failed to justify manifold increase in the prices of the shares despite weak financials of the companies. Initial investment in the company of unknown credential and subsequent jump in the share prices of such a company, cannot be an accident or windfall but could be possible, because of manipulation in the share

PRASHANT CHANDULAL PARIKH, HUF,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 369/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 369/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18) बनाम/ Prashant Chandulal Assistant Commissioner Of Parikh, Huf Income Tax Vs. C/O M/S. Chandulal J Circle 5(2)(1), Ahmedabad Parikh, 303 Ushadep Complex, Nr. Navrangpura, Railway Crossing, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 380009 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aadhp9467M (Appellant) .. (Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri Rajendera K Shah, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Rignesh Das, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 19/11/2024 /11/2024 Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri Rajendera K Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 54F

demonetization period. In the course of assessment, the ITA No. 369/Ahd/2024 [Prashant Chandulal Parikh, HUF vs. ACIT] A.Y. 2017-18 - 2 – AO found that the assessee had sold agricultural land along with his two brothers, on which capital gain

MARGI DARPAN SHAH,VADODARA vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), VADODARA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 664/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2017-18

Section 144

demonetization period. Thereafter, the assessment proceedings were initiated against the assessee and on an analysis of the facts of the assessee, the Assessing Officer observed that there were total cash deposits amounting to Rs.49,32,000/- in various Bank Accounts held by the assessee and there were credit entries amounting to Rs.3,16,45,962/- in these bank accounts. Further

INCOME TAX OFFICER, AHMEDABAD vs. BELA KIRITKUMAR NAHTA, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 882/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.882/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 The Ito Bela Kiritkumar Nahta बनाम/ B-502, 5Th Floor 5, Gopinath Society V/S. Pratyaksh Kar Bhavan Opp. Sunrise Park Ambawadi Vastrapur Ahmedabad – 380 015 Ahmedabad – 380 015 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Acapn 1242 K अपीलाथ%/ (Appellant) &' यथ%/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Hardik Vora, Ar Revenue By : Shri Rignesh Das, Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 06/01/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 09/01/2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Hardik Vora, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, Sr.DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

demonetization period in her accounts at: - Nutan Nagrik Co-op Bank: Rs.84,39,000 and Rs.47,00,000/- (two entries allegedly). - Axis Bank: Rs.64,88,500/-. ITO vs. Bela Kiritkumar Nahta Asst. Year : 2017-18 2.2. Since the assessee failed to provide satisfactory evidence for these deposits, the AO treated the entire amount as unexplained cash credit under Section

TALSHIBHAI RAMJIBHAI GOTI,BHAVNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(9), BHAVNAGAR, BHAVNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 149/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh C Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Chand Meena, Sr DR

capital gain working is on record. Therefore, it is hereby held that the Revenue Authorities erred in making an addition of entire amount. 3. Further, we find the bank interest details which are as under: Sr.No. Date Amount(Rs.) 1. 02.05.2016 739.00 2. 01.08.2016 367.00 3. 02.11.2016 744.00 4. 02.11.2016 4132.00 Total 5,982.00 3.1 The amount received on account

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(2)(1) AHMEDABAD, AAYKAR BHAWAN VEJALPUR AHMEDABAD vs. RAMANBHAI JAGABHAI BHARWAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 1834/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT DRFor Respondent: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Adv. & Shri
Section 148Section 149(1)(b)Section 151Section 69A

demonetization period. On the basis of this information, the AO recorded that income to the extent of Rs. 6.80 crore had escaped assessment and issued a notice under Section 148 of the Act to reopen the case. The assessee submitted his reply on 06.05.2023 giving details of its case. Despite these submissions, the AO was of the view that that

SHRI NAGIN A VAGHELA,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for A

ITA 1562/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyali.T(Ss).A. Nos.449/Ahd/2019 & 44/Ahd/2020 (A.Ys.: 2011-12 & 2012-13) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Shri Nagin A. Vaghela, Tax, 11, Purva Bunglow, Nr. Central Circle-3, Manglam Duple, Sama, Vadodara Vadodara [Pan No.Aakpw5302R] (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR & Shri Rignesh Das, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 158B

capital gains was offered to tax in the return or whether it was properly accounted for. More crucially, since A.Y. 2011-12 was an unabated year for the purposes of section 153A proceedings, the AO could not have made any additions unless incriminating documents were found during the search. The assessment record does not mention any such incriminating material that

SHRI NAGIN A VAGHELA,VADODARA vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for A

ITA 270/AHD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyali.T(Ss).A. Nos.449/Ahd/2019 & 44/Ahd/2020 (A.Ys.: 2011-12 & 2012-13) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Shri Nagin A. Vaghela, Tax, 11, Purva Bunglow, Nr. Central Circle-3, Manglam Duple, Sama, Vadodara Vadodara [Pan No.Aakpw5302R] (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR & Shri Rignesh Das, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 158B

capital gains was offered to tax in the return or whether it was properly accounted for. More crucially, since A.Y. 2011-12 was an unabated year for the purposes of section 153A proceedings, the AO could not have made any additions unless incriminating documents were found during the search. The assessment record does not mention any such incriminating material that