BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai26Delhi14Jaipur9Lucknow7Varanasi6Chennai6Ahmedabad4Kolkata4Chandigarh2Bangalore1Cuttack1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)4Section 404Disallowance4Addition to Income4Section 143(3)3Section 80C3Bogus Purchases3Natural Justice3Deduction3Section 41(1)

SHRI ASHISH HARIBHAI PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 2078/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad06 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri S. N. Divetia, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mudit Nagpal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 41(1)Section 44A

bogus purchases to the turn of Rs.9,27,747/-. 5. During the course of assessment proceeding, the assessee was told to submit the books of accounts for F.Y. 2009-10 along with all ledgers, cash books, register for purchase and sales, with bills/vouchers and other relevant documents in respect of his return filed. In response whereof, the assessee furnished

2
Section 682
Section 244A2

SARITA R JADON,PANCHMAHAL vs. THE DCIT, PANCHMAHAL CIRCLE, GODHRA

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1525/AHD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Sulabh Padshah, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 43BSection 80C

80C - Rs. 16,615/- Interest u/s 244A - Rs. 33,813/- Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - Rs. 6,73,079/- Labourand Wage Expenses - Rs. 37,50,342/- Piece work rate - Rs. 8,57,326/- Bogus Purchase - Rs. 9,48,054/- It is submitted that the assessee has filed all the details and evidences with regard to all the above claims showing that

SARITA R JADON,PANCHMAHAL vs. THE DCIT, PANCHMAHAL CIRCLE, GODHRA

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1526/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Sulabh Padshah, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 43BSection 80C

80C - Rs. 16,615/- Interest u/s 244A - Rs. 33,813/- Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - Rs. 6,73,079/- Labourand Wage Expenses - Rs. 37,50,342/- Piece work rate - Rs. 8,57,326/- Bogus Purchase - Rs. 9,48,054/- It is submitted that the assessee has filed all the details and evidences with regard to all the above claims showing that

SHALLU BANSAL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 30/AHD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 30/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 Shallu Bansal Dcit, Cent.Cir.1(3) Plot No.1497-B Vs Ahmedabad. Opp: Theosophical Lodge Rupani Circle Bhavnagar 364 001. Pan : Aijpb 8274 G अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri B.R. Popat, Ar Revenue By : Shri Kamlesh Makwana, Sr.Dr

For Appellant: Shri B.R. Popat, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, Sr.DR
Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 68Section 80C

purchase and sale of shares and these transactions were entered through M/s.Mahasagar Securities P.Ltd. The said Mahsasagar Securities has been claimed to be sub-broker of NSE and transaction rooted through them were found to be bogus. Hence, the AO did not accept the claim of short term capital gain. He made addition on account of unexplained cash credit under