Search: bogus purchases

12 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 251clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 6820 Section 14713 Addition to Income12 Section 25011 Section 14810 Section 143(3)6 Reopening of Assessment5 Section 69C4 Section 142(1)

RAMJIBHAI KESARAJI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(2), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 827/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Prashant Upadhyay, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kamal Deep Singh, Sr DR

Section 147Section 250Section 251Section 69C

bogus purchases without proper appreciation of the documents and evidence submitted by the appellant. 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in holding that there was no sufficient cause for delay in filing the appeal without making a proper inquiry into the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. The appellant prays that the delay in filing the appeal before

RAMJIBHAI KESARAJI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(2), VADODARA

RAMJIBHAI KESARAJI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(2), VADODARA

DILIPKUMAR PASHABHAI PRAJAPATI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD

DILIPKUMAR PASHABHAI PRAJAPATI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD

H K ISPAT PVT. LTD.,PANCHMAHAL vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA, VADODARA vs. HK ISPAT PVT LTD, GODHRA

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA, VADODARA vs. HK ISPAT PVT LTD, GODHRA

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD., VEJALPUR vs. 7NR RETAIL LIMITED, NAVRANGPURA

SHAILESHBHAI BHA vs. ANGBHAI CHAVDA,BHAVNAGARVS.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(4) BHAVNAGAR, BHAVNAGAR

KRUTIKA ASHWIN SARVAIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-5(3)(4), AHMEDABAD

SAKET M JAIN (HUF),AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(4), AHMEDABAD

ILABAHEN VIRALKUMAR MEHTA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, ANAND

DCIT, AHMEDABAD vs. TRIPOLI MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED, AHMEDABAD