THE ACIT,(OSD)-I,RANGE-4,, AHMEDABAD vs. JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

THE ACIT,(OSD)-I,RANGE-4,, AHMEDABAD vs. JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,(OSD)-I,RANGE-4,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

JMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,(OSD)-I,RANGE-4,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

132 of the Act was conducted on the assessee on 17-11-2011 at the registered premises and proceedings u/s.153A of the Act were initiated. The summary of return of income filed and assessment completed are tabulated below: A.Y. Date of Filing Date of Filing Section under Date of Order of Date of Order of Original Revised Return which

INDIAN ION EXCHANGE & CHEMICALS LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-2(1)(1) PREVIOUSLY WARD-2(1)(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 132(4) of the Act, Shri Mahendra Shantilal Paltel had admitted that he did not supply the materials, that he was issuing only bogus bills and that he had no supporting documents in respect of transportation to parties, labour charges paid etc. The Ld. Sr. DR submitted that there was no dispute to the fact that M/s. Siddh Syndicate

ACIT, CIRCLE-1, BHAVNAGAR, BHAVNAGAR vs. LEELA GREENSHIP RECYCLING PRIVATE LIMITED, BHAVNAGAR

In the result, both the appeals are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes in terms of above directions

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No. 2111/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2018-19 Leela Greenship Recycling Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Office No.303, 3Rd Floor, बनाम/ Commissioner V/S. B Wing, Leela Efcee, Of Income Tax, Near Aksharwadi Temple, Circle-1, Waghawadi Road, Bhavnagar. Bhavnagar-364002. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aagcg8956L

4. It is, therefore, prayed that the order of Ld. CIT(A) may be set aside and that of the Assessing Officer be restored? 7. During the course of hearing, the learned Authorised Representative (AR) appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that the reopening of assessment under section 147 was bad in law and without jurisdiction. The reopening

ARCOY INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the captioned four appeals of the assessee are hereby allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

purchases made from other concerns in other years, there are corresponding concerns in table 2 in the annexure to his statement. 10. He categorically admitted that all the loans and advances are merely bogus in nature. He also submitted date-wise and party-wise details of such bogus transactions. Further, Shri Bharat Padiya, Executive Director of Dishman Group has also

ARCOY INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the captioned four appeals of the assessee are hereby allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

purchases made from other concerns in other years, there are corresponding concerns in table 2 in the annexure to his statement. 10. He categorically admitted that all the loans and advances are merely bogus in nature. He also submitted date-wise and party-wise details of such bogus transactions. Further, Shri Bharat Padiya, Executive Director of Dishman Group has also

ARCOY INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the captioned four appeals of the assessee are hereby allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

purchases made from other concerns in other years, there are corresponding concerns in table 2 in the annexure to his statement. 10. He categorically admitted that all the loans and advances are merely bogus in nature. He also submitted date-wise and party-wise details of such bogus transactions. Further, Shri Bharat Padiya, Executive Director of Dishman Group has also