THA ADDL. CIT, RANGE-1,, BARODA vs. M/S. GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED.,, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. The assessee-company has complied with the applicable legal provisions under the Companies Act, particularly, sections 149, 372A, 249, requirements of Schedule VI as well as the provisions of AS-13 on investment. The assessee has maintained only one portfolio. It is further pleaded that during the year there

THE ADDL.CIT, RANGE-1, BARODA vs. GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMEICALS LTD, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. The assessee-company has complied with the applicable legal provisions under the Companies Act, particularly, sections 149, 372A, 249, requirements of Schedule VI as well as the provisions of AS-13 on investment. The assessee has maintained only one portfolio. It is further pleaded that during the year there

GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE ADDL. CIT, RANGE-1,, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. The assessee-company has complied with the applicable legal provisions under the Companies Act, particularly, sections 149, 372A, 249, requirements of Schedule VI as well as the provisions of AS-13 on investment. The assessee has maintained only one portfolio. It is further pleaded that during the year there

GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMEICALS LTD,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. The assessee-company has complied with the applicable legal provisions under the Companies Act, particularly, sections 149, 372A, 249, requirements of Schedule VI as well as the provisions of AS-13 on investment. The assessee has maintained only one portfolio. It is further pleaded that during the year there

GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. The assessee-company has complied with the applicable legal provisions under the Companies Act, particularly, sections 149, 372A, 249, requirements of Schedule VI as well as the provisions of AS-13 on investment. The assessee has maintained only one portfolio. It is further pleaded that during the year there

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed

TDS (column 7 of Schedle-TDS2) 11b TAXES PAID c TCS (column 7 of schedule-TCS 11c d Self Assessment Tax (from Schedule-IT) 11d e Total Taxes Paid (10a+10b+10c+10d) 10e 11 Amount payable (Enter if 9 is greater than 10e, else enter 0) 11 12 Refund (If 10e is greater than 9, also