BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai27Jaipur17Delhi17Cochin11Bangalore11Lucknow10Kolkata10Pune6Chandigarh6Raipur6Ahmedabad6Chennai5Hyderabad4Amritsar3Visakhapatnam2Nagpur1Indore1Cuttack1Rajkot1Varanasi1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Deduction6TDS6Section 105Disallowance5Section 1484Section 80C4Section 404Addition to Income4Section 148A3Section 151

RUPINDER SINGH DUGGAL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-5(3)(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1921/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149Section 151Section 192Section 54Section 80C

TDS Statement- Salary to employees 10,49,754 Form 16 8,98,920 (Section 192) Sale of immovable 32,00,000 Sale deed and property Purchase deed 20,93,414 Purchase of equity share in recognized 14,42,420 Self explanatory from Loss stock exchange the NSE DATA Sale of equity share (setting by the actual - 12,54,275 Self

3
Section 164(1)3
Section 143(3)3

VINAYNA VELJEE,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-5(2)(4), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 49/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Jun 2022AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri B.T. Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 194D

TDS of " 7,950/- u/s 194DA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). The assessee had paid one-time premium of " 38,63,753/- for a policy sum assured of " 53,00,000/- which exceeds 20% of capital sum assured, and therefore a portion of sum received (of 1st installment of " 7,95,000/- from LIC) is taxable

SMT. PASHIBEN PRAJAPATI FAMILY TRUST (DISC),AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in the manner as indicated above

ITA 305/AHD/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Aug 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Ld. Cit(A) Has In-Turn Arisen From The Intimation Dated 07.12.2022 Issued By Cpc, Bengaluru, U/S.154(Cpc/2122/U5/ 314311772) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri Rupesh R Shah, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 154Section 164(1)Section 250Section 80Section 80C

TDS and non allowability of deduction u/s 80C, and shall grant the same, after due verifications, if so warranted. Further, the chargeability to income-tax and scope of income is defined under the 1961 Act by the provisions of Section

SARITA R JADON,PANCHMAHAL vs. THE DCIT, PANCHMAHAL CIRCLE, GODHRA

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1526/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Sulabh Padshah, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 43BSection 80C

80C - Rs. 16,615/- Interest u/s 244A - Rs. 33,813/- Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - Rs. 6,73,079/- Labourand Wage Expenses - Rs. 37,50,342/- Piece work rate - Rs. 8,57,326/- Bogus Purchase - Rs. 9,48,054/- It is submitted that the assessee has filed all the details and evidences with regard to all the above claims showing that

SARITA R JADON,PANCHMAHAL vs. THE DCIT, PANCHMAHAL CIRCLE, GODHRA

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1525/AHD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Sulabh Padshah, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 43BSection 80C

80C - Rs. 16,615/- Interest u/s 244A - Rs. 33,813/- Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - Rs. 6,73,079/- Labourand Wage Expenses - Rs. 37,50,342/- Piece work rate - Rs. 8,57,326/- Bogus Purchase - Rs. 9,48,054/- It is submitted that the assessee has filed all the details and evidences with regard to all the above claims showing that

M S HOSTEL,NEW SAMA SAVLI ROAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(3), VADODARA, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, VADODARA

In the result, appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 614/AHD/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Respondent: Ms. Saumya Pandey Jain, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 40A(2)(b)

TDS was made good by payment of self assessment tax on 7th April 2015 6 Since she was not in need of funds she has not withdrawn the same and kept with the appellant firm to the credit of her account" 2.1 Vide notices dated 06/01/2021, 11/06/2021, 06/04/2022, 25/04/2023 the appellant was requested to file its reply, In response