BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore38Mumbai35Jaipur29Chandigarh25Delhi14Chennai13Agra11Pune10Hyderabad8Amritsar7Surat6Indore6Kolkata4Ahmedabad4Rajkot4Cochin1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 69B6Section 684Addition to Income4Section 143(2)2Section 133(6)2Section 1442Section 1482Unexplained Investment2Bogus/Accommodation Entry2Unexplained Cash Credit

AKAR LAMINATORS LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(1) (ASSTT. ORDER PASSING AUTHORITY) DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1)(1) (CURRENT JURISDICTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 716/AHD/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 May 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Talati, A.RFor Respondent: Shri H. Phani Raju, CIT D.R. & Ms. Saumya Pandey
Section 144Section 148Section 68

TDS if any etc. However, the assessee only furnished a ledger copy of the impugned party. As per the ledger copy, the assessee has shown an opening receivable balance of Rs. 3,98,24,625/- only and from 1st April 2011 to 30th ITA nos.716&717/AHD/2023 Asstt. Years- 2012-13 & 2017-18 3 November 2011, the assessee has shown sales

AKAR LAMINATORS LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(1) (ASTT. ORDER PASSSING AUTHORITY) DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1)(1) (CURRENT JURISDICTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

2
Reopening of Assessment2
TDS2

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 717/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Talati, A.RFor Respondent: Shri H. Phani Raju, CIT D.R. & Ms. Saumya Pandey
Section 144Section 148Section 68

TDS if any etc. However, the assessee only furnished a ledger copy of the impugned party. As per the ledger copy, the assessee has shown an opening receivable balance of Rs. 3,98,24,625/- only and from 1st April 2011 to 30th ITA nos.716&717/AHD/2023 Asstt. Years- 2012-13 & 2017-18 3 November 2011, the assessee has shown sales

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RIDDHI STEEL & TUBE PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and that of the assessee is allowed

ITA 909/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Feb 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singh"नधा"रण वष"/ Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ridhi Steels & Tubes Pvt.Ltd. Acit, Cir.5 Ahmedabad. 83/84, Village Kamod Vs. Piplaj Pirana Road Aslali Piplaj, Ahmedabad Pan : Aaccr 0175 J "नधा"रण वष"/ Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Acit, Cir.5 Ridhi Steels & Tubes Pvt.Ltd. Ahmedabad. 83/84, Village Kamod Vs. Piplaj Pirana Road Aslali Piplaj, Ahmedabad

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, ARFor Respondent: Shri
Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 69B

69B of the Income Tax Act. The ld.AO accordingly made addition of Rs.1,37,47,163/-. On appeal, the ld.CIT(A) has deleted this addition by observing that identical addition was made in the Asstt.Year 2009-10, which was though confirmed by the ld.CIT(A), but deleted by the Tribunal. Order of the Tribunal has also been upheld

RIDDHI STEEL & TUBES PVT.LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and that of the assessee is allowed

ITA 638/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Feb 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singh"नधा"रण वष"/ Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ridhi Steels & Tubes Pvt.Ltd. Acit, Cir.5 Ahmedabad. 83/84, Village Kamod Vs. Piplaj Pirana Road Aslali Piplaj, Ahmedabad Pan : Aaccr 0175 J "नधा"रण वष"/ Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Acit, Cir.5 Ridhi Steels & Tubes Pvt.Ltd. Ahmedabad. 83/84, Village Kamod Vs. Piplaj Pirana Road Aslali Piplaj, Ahmedabad

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, ARFor Respondent: Shri
Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 69B

69B of the Income Tax Act. The ld.AO accordingly made addition of Rs.1,37,47,163/-. On appeal, the ld.CIT(A) has deleted this addition by observing that identical addition was made in the Asstt.Year 2009-10, which was though confirmed by the ld.CIT(A), but deleted by the Tribunal. Order of the Tribunal has also been upheld