Search: TDS | BharatTax

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 276Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai18 Delhi16 Kolkata2 Ahmedabad2 Jodhpur1 Lucknow1 Pune1 SC1 Amritsar1 Chennai1 Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)3 Section 194I3 Section 2012 Penalty2 TDS2 Addition to Income2

SHRUTIBEN V PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(2)(5), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 656/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jul 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2015-16 Shrutiben V. Patel Ito, Ward-4(2)(5) 60, Shangrilla Bungalows Vs Ahmedabad. Thaltej Ahmedabad. Pan : Anupp 1796 K

For Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr.DR

Section 194ISection 201Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

TDS Officer, no grievance arose to the assessee. Necessary action, if any, to be taken by the assessee, is to be taken in the concerned proceedings under section 201 and 276C

SHRUTIBEN V PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(2)(5), AHMEDABAD

TRANSWIND COMMUNICATION ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, (OSD), CIRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD

SHRUTIBEN V PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(2)(5), AHMEDABAD

TRANSWIND COMMUNICATION ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, (OSD), CIRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD