BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 272Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore30Karnataka21Mumbai19Delhi10Visakhapatnam6Panaji5Pune4Kolkata2Ahmedabad2Nagpur2Cochin1Raipur1Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 1472Section 1482Section 142(1)2Section 80P(1)(b)2Section 46A2Section 80P2Deduction2TDS2Addition to Income2

THE THAVAR DUDH UTPADAK SAHKARI MANDLI LIMITED,BANASKANTHA vs. THE ACIT/DCIT, CIRCLE- GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1555/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: DR. BRR KUMAR (Vice President), Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 46ASection 80PSection 80P(1)(b)

TDS amount of Rs. 11,869/- from Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. both totaling Rs. 1,65,05,791/-. Hence the assessment was reopened by issuing a notice u/s. 148 of the Act. The assessee has not responded to the above notice as well as the notices issued u/s. 142(1) by the Faceless Assessing Officer, which has resulted

THE THAVAR DUDH UTPADAK SAHAKARI MANDLI LIMITED,BANASKANTHA vs. THE ACIT/DCIT, CIRCLE-GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1556/AHD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Feb 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: DR. BRR KUMAR (Vice President), Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 46ASection 80PSection 80P(1)(b)

TDS amount of Rs. 11,869/- from Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. both totaling Rs. 1,65,05,791/-. Hence the assessment was reopened by issuing a notice u/s. 148 of the Act. The assessee has not responded to the above notice as well as the notices issued u/s. 142(1) by the Faceless Assessing Officer, which has resulted