BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

20 results for “TDS”+ Section 272Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune325Delhi221Mumbai125Chennai88Bangalore71Visakhapatnam56Karnataka26Nagpur25Kolkata23Ahmedabad20Lucknow18Panaji15Indore12Cochin12Surat11Raipur10Hyderabad9Agra8Varanasi6Chandigarh6Jaipur4Rajkot4Patna3Jodhpur2Cuttack2Allahabad1Jabalpur1Guwahati1SC1Amritsar1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 271C60Section 272A(2)(g)42TDS20Section 14A18Section 234E11Addition to Income10Section 26(1)(iii)9Penalty9Depreciation9Disallowance

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2680/AHD/2017[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

TDS in time, while that levied under section 272A(2)(g) for not filing the requisite TDS returns (quarterly) in time

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

9
Section 201(1)8
Section 250(6)4
ITA 2681/AHD/2017[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

TDS in time, while that levied under section 272A(2)(g) for not filing the requisite TDS returns (quarterly) in time

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2678/AHD/2017[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

TDS in time, while that levied under section 272A(2)(g) for not filing the requisite TDS returns (quarterly) in time

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2679/AHD/2017[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

TDS in time, while that levied under section 272A(2)(g) for not filing the requisite TDS returns (quarterly) in time

CORRTECH INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,(OSD) RANGE-1,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 2652/AHD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble& Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 14ASection 26(1)(iii)

TDS return cannot be generated and consequently, Form 27A (i.e. form for furnishing information with the return or statement of deduction of tax at source filed on computer media) also cannot be generated. Section 273B provides that in case reasonable cause is shown, penalty u/s 272A

THE DCIT(OSD) RANGE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. CORRTECH INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 1129/AHD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble& Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 14ASection 26(1)(iii)

TDS return cannot be generated and consequently, Form 27A (i.e. form for furnishing information with the return or statement of deduction of tax at source filed on computer media) also cannot be generated. Section 273B provides that in case reasonable cause is shown, penalty u/s 272A

CORRTECH INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(OSD),, AHMEDABAD

ITA 821/AHD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble& Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 14ASection 26(1)(iii)

TDS return cannot be generated and consequently, Form 27A (i.e. form for furnishing information with the return or statement of deduction of tax at source filed on computer media) also cannot be generated. Section 273B provides that in case reasonable cause is shown, penalty u/s 272A

CORRTECH INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADDL. CIT, TDS RANGE,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 2406/AHD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble& Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 14ASection 26(1)(iii)

TDS return cannot be generated and consequently, Form 27A (i.e. form for furnishing information with the return or statement of deduction of tax at source filed on computer media) also cannot be generated. Section 273B provides that in case reasonable cause is shown, penalty u/s 272A

CORRTECH INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADDL. CIT, TDS RANGE,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 2408/AHD/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble& Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 14ASection 26(1)(iii)

TDS return cannot be generated and consequently, Form 27A (i.e. form for furnishing information with the return or statement of deduction of tax at source filed on computer media) also cannot be generated. Section 273B provides that in case reasonable cause is shown, penalty u/s 272A

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. CORRTECH INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 1358/AHD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble& Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 14ASection 26(1)(iii)

TDS return cannot be generated and consequently, Form 27A (i.e. form for furnishing information with the return or statement of deduction of tax at source filed on computer media) also cannot be generated. Section 273B provides that in case reasonable cause is shown, penalty u/s 272A

CORRTECH INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,(OSD)RANGE-1,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 1785/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble& Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 14ASection 26(1)(iii)

TDS return cannot be generated and consequently, Form 27A (i.e. form for furnishing information with the return or statement of deduction of tax at source filed on computer media) also cannot be generated. Section 273B provides that in case reasonable cause is shown, penalty u/s 272A

THE DCIT(OSD)RANGE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. CORRTECH INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 1871/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble& Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 14ASection 26(1)(iii)

TDS return cannot be generated and consequently, Form 27A (i.e. form for furnishing information with the return or statement of deduction of tax at source filed on computer media) also cannot be generated. Section 273B provides that in case reasonable cause is shown, penalty u/s 272A

THE DCIT(OSD) RANGE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. CORRTECH INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 2578/AHD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble& Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 14ASection 26(1)(iii)

TDS return cannot be generated and consequently, Form 27A (i.e. form for furnishing information with the return or statement of deduction of tax at source filed on computer media) also cannot be generated. Section 273B provides that in case reasonable cause is shown, penalty u/s 272A

BANK OF BARODA,ANAND vs. THE ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1608/AHD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 May 2022AY 2013-14
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr. D.R
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 220(2)Section 234E

272A became redundant and by adding a proviso to the said section, this effect was therefore limited upto 01.07.2012. 17. In essence, section 234E thus prescribed for the first time charging of a fee for every day of default in filing of statement under sub-section (3) of section 200 or any proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C

TORQUE AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT(TSD),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1818/AHD/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. DR
Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

TDS Certificates. The said bonafide explanations were not considered neither by AO nor Ld. CIT(A). On facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned penalty levied of Rs.85,800/- by invoking the provision of section 272A

TORQUE AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT(TSD),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1816/AHD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. DR
Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

TDS Certificates. The said bonafide explanations were not considered neither by AO nor Ld. CIT(A). On facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned penalty levied of Rs.85,800/- by invoking the provision of section 272A

TORQUE AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT(TSD),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1815/AHD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. DR
Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

TDS Certificates. The said bonafide explanations were not considered neither by AO nor Ld. CIT(A). On facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned penalty levied of Rs.85,800/- by invoking the provision of section 272A

TORQUE AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT(TSD),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1817/AHD/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. DR
Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

TDS Certificates. The said bonafide explanations were not considered neither by AO nor Ld. CIT(A). On facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned penalty levied of Rs.85,800/- by invoking the provision of section 272A

GANESH HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADDL.CIT, TDS CIRCLE, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1196/AHD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1196/Ahd/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Ganesh Housing Corporation Adcit(Tds Circle) बनाम/ 2Nd Floor, Amrutjayanti Ltd., 100 Ft. Hebatpur, Vs. Bhavan, Navjivan Trust Thaltej Road, Nr. Sola Building, Off. Ashram Bridge, Off. S. G. Highway, Road, Ahmedabad- Ahmedabad-380054 380009 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaacg5590Q .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shah, ARsFor Respondent: 12/10/2021
Section 203Section 271A(2)(g)Section 272A(2)(g)Section 273B

272A(2)(g) of the Act was passed by the Additional Commissioner (TDS) on 18.06.2018 holding that the assessee company had failed in compliance of TDS provision by not filing due quarterly return within the due date nor furnished certificate as required under Section

TGB BANQUEST AND HOTELS LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, TDS CIRCLE,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the five appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 1167/AHD/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Sept 2021AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Withdrawal ApplicationFor Respondent: Shri Purshottam Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 272A(2)(g)

TDS Circle, The Grand Bhagwati, Vs Ahmedabad S.G. Highway Road, (Respondent) Bodakdev, Ahmedabad PAN: AABCB6825A (Appellant) Revenue by: Shri Purshottam Kumar, Sr. D.R. Assessee by: Withdrawal Application Date of hearing : 16-09-2021 Date of pronouncement : 21-09-2021 आदेश/ORDER PER BENCH:- The assessee has filed five appeals for A.Y. 2012-13 to 2016-17, arise from order