Search: TDS | BharatTax

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi41 Mumbai22 Bangalore11 Amritsar6 Indore6 Jaipur6 Lucknow5 Ahmedabad4 Hyderabad4 Pune3 Jodhpur1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 2638 Section 143(3)6 Section 133(6)2 Section 133A2 Section 36(1)(va)2 Cash Deposit2 Demonetization2

HIMANSHU ENGINEERING WORKS,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-3,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 675/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 May 2022AY 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri P.F. Jain, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Shushilkumar Madhuk, CIT-D.R

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 40A(3)

TDS figure with the receipts and hence the order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. Further, Principal CIT observed that assessee had taken certain amount as advances against labour work and most of which had been repaid within a period of 9 months in cash. The AO failed to examine the applicability of sections 269SS

HIMANSHU ENGINEERING WORKS,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-3,, AHMEDABAD

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. REKHA INDRAVADAN CHOKSHI, AHMEDABAD

HIMANSHU ENGINEERING WORKS,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-3,, AHMEDABAD

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. REKHA INDRAVADAN CHOKSHI, AHMEDABAD

REKHABEN INDRAVADAN CHOKSHI,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-5(2)(4), AHMEDABAD

TULSI REALITY,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-1, VADODARA