Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi207 Mumbai196 Bangalore75 Chennai49 Indore37 Jaipur26 Kolkata19 Pune16 Hyderabad15 Chandigarh12 Rajkot11 Ahmedabad8 Patna5 Lucknow4 SC3 Guwahati3 Nagpur3 Visakhapatnam3 Jodhpur2 Amritsar2 Ranchi1 Cochin1 Surat1 Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 271C28 Section 272A(2)(g)20 TDS6 Section 271(1)(c)5 Penalty5 Section 250(6)4 Section 133A4 Section 201(1)4 Section 2014 Section 194H

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2681/AHD/2017[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

sections 194C, 194H, 194-I, 194J and 192B and defaulted in ITA No.2678 to 2681/Ahd/2017 (4 Appeals) 3 complying with the TDS

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

4

Survey u/s 133A4

ITA 2680/AHD/2017[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

sections 194C, 194H, 194-I, 194J and 192B and defaulted in ITA No.2678 to 2681/Ahd/2017 (4 Appeals) 3 complying with the TDS

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2679/AHD/2017[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

sections 194C, 194H, 194-I, 194J and 192B and defaulted in ITA No.2678 to 2681/Ahd/2017 (4 Appeals) 3 complying with the TDS

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2678/AHD/2017[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Mar 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 272A(2)(g)

sections 194C, 194H, 194-I, 194J and 192B and defaulted in ITA No.2678 to 2681/Ahd/2017 (4 Appeals) 3 complying with the TDS

KAMLESH GHANSHYAMDAS THAWANI,KUBERNAGAR, AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7(2)(1) AHMEDABAD, INCOME TAX OFFICE, PRATYAKSHA KAR BHAWAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 618/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Jun 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2016-17

Section 148Section 194HSection 28Section 37(1)Section 40

TDS Section 194H of the Act. The assessee is one of the beneficiaries of the said transactions and has taken

ARVIND FASHIONS LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PCIT, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 913/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

section 194C, 194H and 194] of the Act requires the assessee to deduct the TDS with respect to sum/income payable

N K PROTEINS PVT. LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is directed to be deleted and the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 463/AHD/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jun 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ketan Gajjar, CIT-D.R

Section 194HSection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 40

Section 194H. 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in confirming the disallowance of transaction charges of Rs.1,30,29,338/- in as much as there is no obligation on the part of assessee to recover such amount from the client and the assessee is following consistent practice not to recover such charges

IRM PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1590/AHD/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Jun 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No. 1590/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2011-12 Irm Private Limited, The Deputy Commissioner Irm House, बनाम/ Of Income Tax, V/S. Off. C.G Raod, Circle 2(1)(1), Navrangpura, Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad-380009. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aaaci3678M अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Bandish Soparkar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Abhijit, Sr-Dr

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit, SR-DR

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 194HSection 194J

194H during the financial year 2010–11 relevant to A.Y. 2011– 12, aggregating to Rs. 50,46,979/-. IRM Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT A.Y 2011-12 3 (ii) That cash expenditure exceeding Rs. 10,00,000/- in a single month was recorded in the NMS data. (iii) That information was received from ITO, Jalandhar (vide letter dated 16.03.2017 under section