HYDCO ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.,,CHHATRAL vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(3),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal is allowed

TDS u/s 194C(6) as the details of PAN of transporter was Assessment Year : 2012-13 Page 2 of 6 obtained by the assessee company thereby complying the conditions of the law as per section

ASIAN MILLS PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADDL.CIT, RANGE-1,,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1397/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2011-2012 Asian Mills Pvt. Ltd., A.C.I.T., 104, Sakar Iii, Vs. Range-1, Opp. Old High Court, Ahmedabad. Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380014. Pan: Aabca8236G & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1531/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2011-2012 D.C.I.T., Asian Mills Pvt. Ltd., Circle-1(1)(1), Vs. 104, Sakar Iii, Ahmedabad. Opp. Old High Court, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380014. Pan: Aabca8236G

TDS return in form 26Q for Quarter 3 and 4 it has reported PAN of all the parties to whom transportation charges and freight inward charges were paid. Thus, in view of the provision to sub-section (6) to section 194C

SHRI SAMIR CHANDRAVADAB BHALAVAT,,BARODA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, SABARKANTHA WARD-4,, MODASA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

TDS under section 194C (6) of the Act. Accordingly the assessee did not deduct the TDS. Page 4 of 10 Asstt

CRYSTAL QUINONE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the assessee’s appeal stands allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & M/S. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1420/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12) बनाम/ Crystal Quinone Pvt. Ltd. Dcit, Cir-1(1)(2), Opp. Old Excise Chawky, Vs. Ahmedabad S.M. Road, Ahmedabad

TDS do not apply to the assessee. 9. Being aggrieved by the order of Ld. CIT (A), the assessee is in appeal before us. 10. The Ld. AR before us submitted that the assessee had furnished the PAN of all the transport contractors during the assessment proceedings as required under section 194C(6

SUMMIT (INDIA) WATER TREATMENT & SERVICES LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-4, AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

194C or Section 195 could be ascertained. The assessee has only submitted the copses of invoices which can lead to the conclusion that the payment has been made to the said party, but it does not prove that the agent has been covered under the provisions of Section 172 of IT Act. Thus, the contention of the assessee that

SHRI VISHAL DILIP PALANY,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(4),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year : 2009-10 Shri Vishal Dilip Palani, Income Tax Officer, C/O. Ketan H. Shah, Advocate, Vs Ward 9(4), 903, Sapphire Complex, C.G. Road, Ahmedabad Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380009 Pan : Alopp 0931 E अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri M.J. Shah & Shri Rushin Patel, Ars Revenue By : Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 08/09/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 12/10/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per P.M. Jagtap, Vice-: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Xv, Ahmedabad [“Cit(A) In Short]” Dated 04.02.2013. 2. At The Outset, It Is Noted That There Is A Delay Of 357 Days On The Part Of The Assessee In Filing The Appeal Before The Tribunal. In This Regard, The Assessee Has Filed An Affidavit Giving Details Of The Deteriorating Health Of His Father As Well As Financial Problems Faced During The Relevant Period Which Resulted In The Said Delay. Keeping In View The Same, We Are Satisfied That There Was A Sufficient Cause For The Delay Of 357 Days On The Part Of The Assessee In Filing The Appeal Before The Tribunal. The Learned Departmental Representative Has Not Raised Any Objection In This Regard. We, Therefore, Shri Vishal Dilip Palani Vs. Ito Ay : 2009-10 2

6. We have heard Shri Shah representing assessee and Shri Madhushudhan appearing as Senior Departmental Representative reiterating their respective stands against and in support of the impugned disallowance. It is an undisputed fact that the assessee has not deducted TDS upon the freight payments in question. Both the lower authorities invoke Section 194C

SHRI VISHAL D PALANI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, TDS-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

6. We have heard Shri Shah representing assessee and Shri Madhushudhan appearing as Senior Departmental Representative reiterating their respective stands against and in support of the impugned disallowance. It is an undisputed fact that the assessee has not deducted TDS upon the freight payments in question. Both the lower authorities invoke Section 194C

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

194C, 194H, 194-I, 194J and 192B and defaulted in ITA No.2678 to 2681/Ahd/2017 (4 Appeals) 3 complying with the TDS provisions. A survey operation under section 133A of the Act was carried out at the business premises of the assessee on 30.11.2015 by the Income Tax Authority of TDS Range, Ahmedabad. During the course of survey, it was observed

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

194C, 194H, 194-I, 194J and 192B and defaulted in ITA No.2678 to 2681/Ahd/2017 (4 Appeals) 3 complying with the TDS provisions. A survey operation under section 133A of the Act was carried out at the business premises of the assessee on 30.11.2015 by the Income Tax Authority of TDS Range, Ahmedabad. During the course of survey, it was observed

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

194C, 194H, 194-I, 194J and 192B and defaulted in ITA No.2678 to 2681/Ahd/2017 (4 Appeals) 3 complying with the TDS provisions. A survey operation under section 133A of the Act was carried out at the business premises of the assessee on 30.11.2015 by the Income Tax Authority of TDS Range, Ahmedabad. During the course of survey, it was observed

XCELLON EDUCATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

194C, 194H, 194-I, 194J and 192B and defaulted in ITA No.2678 to 2681/Ahd/2017 (4 Appeals) 3 complying with the TDS provisions. A survey operation under section 133A of the Act was carried out at the business premises of the assessee on 30.11.2015 by the Income Tax Authority of TDS Range, Ahmedabad. During the course of survey, it was observed

THE ITO,PATAN WARD-3,, MEHSANA vs. M/S. SIDDHI VINAYAK TRANSPORT, MEHSANA

In the result, the Department’s appeal is partly allowed

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Waseem Ahmedassessment Year: 2008-09

6 of 12 party-wise freight payment details, despite several opportunities, when the assessee’s turnover was exceeding Rs.20 crores and the assessee was well supported by qualified staff; and that thus, since the assessee had not complied with the provisions of section 194C of the Act, disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act was required

ITO, WARD-2(1) (1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. EYLEX FILMS PVT. LTD., RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Justice Shri P. P. Bhatt & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

TDS is required to be deducted for the payment of film distribution share. The relevant extract of the decision is reproduced hereunder:- "6. From the above, it is clear that section 194C

ITO, WARD-2(1) (1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. EYLEX FILMS PVT. LTD., RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Justice Shri P. P. Bhatt & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

TDS is required to be deducted for the payment of film distribution share. The relevant extract of the decision is reproduced hereunder:- "6. From the above, it is clear that section 194C

SAGAR POWERTEX PVT. LTD. (EARLIER SAGAR AGENCIES PVT.LTD.),AHMEDABAD vs. THE JT.CIT, RANGE-8,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.304/Ahd/2014 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2009-2010 Sagar Powertex Pvt. Ltd., J.C.I.T., (Earlier Sagar Agencies Pvt. Ltd.) Vs. Range-8, 803, Sahajanand Complex, Ahmedabad. Shahibaug Road, Shahiibaug Ahmedabad-380004. Pan: Aadcs0473P

6 defined under the provisions of the Act whether the ownership refers to the legal ownership or the beneficial ownership. Undoubtedly, the assessee in the present case is not the legal owner of the vehicles but it has made the payment for the acquisition of the cars. Thus it can be inferred that the assessee owns the cars

THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-1(2),, BARODA vs. M/S. DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS, BARODA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 2970/Ahd/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2014-2015 D.C.I.T., M/S Deloitee Haskins & Sells, Circle-1(2), Vs. 31-Nutan Bharat Society, Vadodara. Alkapuri, Baroda.

6 Scope of Work Whereas DTTIPL provides, among others, the following services to its clients • Management Consultancy services • Assistance in all matters relating to direct and indirect taxes • Any other service that may be agreed upon as per the requirement of its clients Whereas, DHS B has been appointed/engaged/retained by its clients to perform identical services and is desirous

FORTUNE BARODA NETWORK PVT. LTD.,,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-1,, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

194C of the Act on payments made to the licensor for obtaining TV signals, Cable TV Network owned by the assessee. Further, the assessee, in his aforementioned reply dated 28/02/2016 , accepted that as this was its first year of-operation and it was unaware of provision of law so there was lapse on its part in the deduction

GUJARAT SICKLE ANEMIA CONTROL SOCIETY,,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

TDS Rs. Deducted F.Y. 2012-13 1 SCHAMKA Technology Pvt. Ltd. 28973253 2% 591290 2 Indian Red Cross Society 796670 2% 16258 3 Valsad Raktdan Kendra 7333450 2% 149663 4 Kruise Pathline Pvt. Ltd. 3783166 2% 77207 5 Heaithfore Technologies Ltd. 14658601 2% 299156 (Formerly known as Religare Technologies Ltd.) 6 Indu Health Research Foundation 6753789 2% 137832 Trust

GUJARAT SICKLE ANEMIA CONTROL SOCIETY,,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

TDS Rs. Deducted F.Y. 2012-13 1 SCHAMKA Technology Pvt. Ltd. 28973253 2% 591290 2 Indian Red Cross Society 796670 2% 16258 3 Valsad Raktdan Kendra 7333450 2% 149663 4 Kruise Pathline Pvt. Ltd. 3783166 2% 77207 5 Heaithfore Technologies Ltd. 14658601 2% 299156 (Formerly known as Religare Technologies Ltd.) 6 Indu Health Research Foundation 6753789 2% 137832 Trust