ARCHANABEN RAJENDRASINGH DEVAL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, as indicated\nabove

Bench: SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER\nAND\nSHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nआयकर अपील सं/ITA No.1465/Ahd/2024\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2015-16\nArchanaben Rajendrasingh\nDeval\nबनाम /\nv/s.\nThe Income Tax Officer\nTDS Ward-1,\nAhmedabad – 380 014\n42, Tirth Bhumi Co-op. Society\nNear Dhara Soap Factory\nNikol Gam Road,\nNikol, Ahmedabad – 382 350\nस्थायी लेखा सं./PAN: AHZPD 2745 D\n(अपीलार्थी/ Appellant)\n(प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)\nAssessee by :\nShri Jaimin Sha

TDS provisions of section 1941A is not\napplicable, which ground is not considered by the CIT(A) and therefore the order\npassed by CIT(A) is against the provision of law and therefore the addition made\nu/s 201(1)/201(1A) require to be deleted.\n4. That the assesse has purchase agriculture land along with her co-owner for\nRs.1

AKSHATAM CONSTRUCTION LLP,VADODARA vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1559/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2014-15 Akshatam Construction Llp, D.C.I.T., 302, Silver Coin, Vs. Circle-1(2), Shrenik Park Char Rasta, Vadodara. Nr. Akota Statdium, Vadodara-390020. Pan: Aaxfa6302N

section 194C of the Act. But the assessee has not deducted the TDS on such expenses. Therefore the AO disallowed the same and added to the total income of the assessee. 14. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal to the learned CIT-A who confirmed the order of the AO by observing as under: 7.1 I have considered the written submission

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. ACIT (OSD), TDS,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed) [Through Virtual Court]

TDS Officer treating the Appellant as an 'assessee in default' under section 201 r.w.s. 194H of the Act without ascertaining and proving that whether the recipient had paid taxes on the alleged income received / receivable from the Appellant as required u/s. 191

S B DEVELOPERS,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2023-24

Section 191 of the Act and also as Assessment Year: 2023-24 S B Developers vs. ITO Page 3 of 3 per Rule 37BA. The matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer to consider the receipts for the last two years and, after verifying the same, the assessee be given credit of TDS

TORRENT POWER LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,RANGE-8,, AHMEDABAD

In the result cross objection filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

section 80-IA of the Act. 69. The learned CIT (A) disregarded the contention of the assessee by observing that the impugned income does not have nexus with the distribution of power activity of the assessee. Thus the learned CIT (A) upheld the finding of the AO. 70. Being aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT (A), the assessee

MANPASAND BEVERAGES LTD.,,VADODARA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(2),, BARODA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- “1. The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Vadodara has erred in law and on facts in confirming the disallowance of an amount of Rs. 1,55,239/- u/s. 14A of the I.T. Act, being I.T.A

M/S. KOSA CONSTRUCTION,,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(3),, VADODARA

In the result, all the grounds appeal of the assessee are allowed

section 143(3) r.w.s. 147of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act” 2. As the facts and issues involved in three appeals are similar, so, we take ITA No. 919/Ahd/2016 for assessment year 2007-08 as the lead case and its findings will be applicable to the other two appeal i.e. ITA Nos. 920 I.T.A

STERLING ABRASIVES LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the department in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Mahavir Prasadआयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 704 & 705/Ahd/2014 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष"/ Assessment Year : 2009-10 & 2010-11 वष" Dy. Commissioner Of Income Sterling Abrasives Ltd. Tax, Vs 45/46, Gidc, Circle-8, Odhav Road, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad – 382 415 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 334/Ahd/2015 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष"/ Assessment Year : 2011-12 वष" Sterling Abrasives Ltd. Dy. Commissioner Of Income 45/46, Gidc, Vs Tax, Odhav Road, Circle-8, Ahmedabad – 382 415 Ahmedabad अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" "" य "" यथ" "" य "" य थ" थ"/ (Respondent) थ" Assessee By : Shri K. Madhusudan, Sr.D.R. Revenue By : Shri S. N. Soparkar, A.R. सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27/10/2017 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 13/11/2017 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश Per Mahavir Prasad:- These Three Appeals, Two By The Revenue & One By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-Xiv, Ahmedabad Dated 04/12/2013 (Revenue) & Cit(A)-10, Ahmedabad Dated 19/12/2014 For Assessment Year 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively. 2. The Revenue Has Taken Following Grounds In Its Appeal Vide Ita No.704/Ahd/2014 For Asst. Year 2009-10:

191 (SC) As assessee has given names and address of concerned persons and TDS was also deducted from said payment. Therefore, we heard the ld. DR and AR as well. In our considered opinion this Ground is not sustainable; therefore, we dismiss this ground. 5.4 So far deleting the addition of Rs.24,54,519/- made u/s.68

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD vs. STERLING ABRASIVES LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the department in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Mahavir Prasadआयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 704 & 705/Ahd/2014 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष"/ Assessment Year : 2009-10 & 2010-11 वष" Dy. Commissioner Of Income Sterling Abrasives Ltd. Tax, Vs 45/46, Gidc, Circle-8, Odhav Road, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad – 382 415 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 334/Ahd/2015 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष"/ Assessment Year : 2011-12 वष" Sterling Abrasives Ltd. Dy. Commissioner Of Income 45/46, Gidc, Vs Tax, Odhav Road, Circle-8, Ahmedabad – 382 415 Ahmedabad अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" "" य "" यथ" "" य "" य थ" थ"/ (Respondent) थ" Assessee By : Shri K. Madhusudan, Sr.D.R. Revenue By : Shri S. N. Soparkar, A.R. सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27/10/2017 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 13/11/2017 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश Per Mahavir Prasad:- These Three Appeals, Two By The Revenue & One By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-Xiv, Ahmedabad Dated 04/12/2013 (Revenue) & Cit(A)-10, Ahmedabad Dated 19/12/2014 For Assessment Year 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively. 2. The Revenue Has Taken Following Grounds In Its Appeal Vide Ita No.704/Ahd/2014 For Asst. Year 2009-10:

191 (SC) As assessee has given names and address of concerned persons and TDS was also deducted from said payment. Therefore, we heard the ld. DR and AR as well. In our considered opinion this Ground is not sustainable; therefore, we dismiss this ground. 5.4 So far deleting the addition of Rs.24,54,519/- made u/s.68

AARVEE DENIMS & EXPORTS LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.396/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2018-19 Aarvee Denims & Exports Ltd. The Pr.Cit बनाम/ 191, Shahwadi Ahmedabad-1 V/S. Narol–Sarkhej Highway Ahmedabad – 382 405 (Gujarat) "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aabca 6019 P (अपीलाथ&/ Appellant) ('( यथ&/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Divyakant Parikh, Ar Revenue By : Shri Prithviraj Meena, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19/09/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 27/09/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am:

191, Shahwadi Ahmedabad-1 v/s. Narol–Sarkhej Highway Ahmedabad – 382 405 (Gujarat) "थायी लेखा सं./PAN: AABCA 6019 P (अपीलाथ&/ Appellant) ('( यथ&/ Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Divyakant Parikh, AR Revenue by : Shri Prithviraj Meena, CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 19/09/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 27/09/2024 आदेश/O R D E R PER MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR

UTKRANTI SOLUTION PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(1)(4), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year : 2018-19 Utkranti Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax Officer, A/46, 3Rd Floor, ‘Nobles’, Opp. Nehru Vs Ward 4(1)(4), Bridge, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad-380009 Pan : Aabcu 1620 L अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Hemanshu Shah, Ca Revenue By : Shri Rakesh Jha, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 15/07/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 20/07/2022

191/-. The said return was processed by the CPC, Bangalore; and, in the intimation issued under Section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” in short) on 27.12.2019, the total income of the assessee was determined at Rs.30,31,250/- after making certain additions. 3. Against the intimation/order passed under Section

TRANSWIND COMMUNICATION ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, (OSD), CIRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Madhumita Roy

section has been enacted to provide for a remedy for loss of revenue and that willful concealment is not an essential ingredient for attracting civil liability as u/s. 271(1)(c) of the I. T. Act. 3.5 Furthermore, the Hon'ble Delhi Court in the case of CIT V/s. ECS Ltd. held that, "In so far as bonafide of assessee

CHIRAG MAHENDRABHAI SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Section 234B and 234C of the Act. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax has passed an order dated 28.09.2016 confirming the same addition made in the intimation and reject the rectification petition filed by the assessee. 3. Aggrieved against this rectification order, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A)-4, Ahmedabad. The short issue in this case

AARVEE DENIMS & EXPORTS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed, while that of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year :2012-13 Aarvee Denims & Exports Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1) 191, Shahwadi, Vs Ahmedabad. Nr.Old Octroi Naka Narol-Sarkhej Highway Ahmedabad 382 405. Pan : Aabca 6019 P Assessment Year : 2012-13 Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1) Aarvee Denims & Exports Ahmedabad. Vs Ahmedabad 382 405. Pan : Aabca 6019 P अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.K. Parikh, Ar Revenue By : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/03/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar: These Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & The Revenue Are Against Order Dated 30.3.2016 Passed By Ld.Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-1, Ahmedabad [For Short “Ld.Cit(A)] In Appeal No.Cit(A)-1/Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1)/738/2014-15 Relating To The Assessment Year 2012-13. We Dispose Of Both The Appeals By This Common Order.

191, Shahwadi, Vs Ahmedabad. Nr.Old Octroi Naka Narol-Sarkhej Highway Ahmedabad 382 405. PAN : AABCA 6019 P Assessment Year : 2012-13 DCIT, Cir.1(1)(1) Aarvee Denims & Exports Ahmedabad. Vs Ahmedabad 382 405. PAN : AABCA 6019 P अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assessee by : Shri D.K. Parikh, AR Revenue by : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. AARVEE DENIMS & EXPORTS LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed, while that of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year :2012-13 Aarvee Denims & Exports Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1) 191, Shahwadi, Vs Ahmedabad. Nr.Old Octroi Naka Narol-Sarkhej Highway Ahmedabad 382 405. Pan : Aabca 6019 P Assessment Year : 2012-13 Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1) Aarvee Denims & Exports Ahmedabad. Vs Ahmedabad 382 405. Pan : Aabca 6019 P अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.K. Parikh, Ar Revenue By : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/03/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar: These Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & The Revenue Are Against Order Dated 30.3.2016 Passed By Ld.Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-1, Ahmedabad [For Short “Ld.Cit(A)] In Appeal No.Cit(A)-1/Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1)/738/2014-15 Relating To The Assessment Year 2012-13. We Dispose Of Both The Appeals By This Common Order.

191, Shahwadi, Vs Ahmedabad. Nr.Old Octroi Naka Narol-Sarkhej Highway Ahmedabad 382 405. PAN : AABCA 6019 P Assessment Year : 2012-13 DCIT, Cir.1(1)(1) Aarvee Denims & Exports Ahmedabad. Vs Ahmedabad 382 405. PAN : AABCA 6019 P अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assessee by : Shri D.K. Parikh, AR Revenue by : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,,WARD-2(1)(2), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. KANAK CASTOR PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedasst.Year : 2008-09

TDS which are placed on pages 45 to 109 and 706 to 710 of the paper book. 8.3 The learned AR also drew our attention on the details of freight inward expenses, freight outward expenses, loading and unloading expenses, stores and spares expenses and packing expenses which are placed on record in the paper book. 8.4 The learned AR with

ARVINDKUMAR AMULKH TANNA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 (3), AHMEADABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

191 3,44,69,278 153A in Rs. Since the Ld.CIT(A) allowed the appeal in part, the Revenue is in appeal(s) before us, and the assessee filed two appeals and Cross Objections. Following are the grounds: 3. Grounds raised by the Revenue in its appeals are as under: (a) In IT(SS)A No.2/Ahd/2021

SHRI ALTAFHUSEN M. SIDDIKI,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(4), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee i

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.577/Ahd/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.969/Ahd/2015 { "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Altafhusen M. Siddiki, Prop Dcit, Circle-9 Of Sunmoon Roadways 6/D/1, Vs Ahmedabad Pursottam Estate, Nr. Cozy Hotel, Ranipur Patia, Sarkhej Road, Narol, Ahmedabad-382405 Pan No.Arsps3765P

191 ITR 667 wherein Hon’ble Apex Court after referring to Rule 6DD of the Rules held as follows: 7. In our opinion, there is little merit in this contention. Section 40A(3) must not be read in isolation or to the exclusion of Rule 6DD. The Section must be read along with the Rule. If read together, it will

SHRI ALTAFHUSEN MAHEMUDUL HASAN SIDDIKI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,RANGE-9,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee i

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.577/Ahd/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.969/Ahd/2015 { "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Altafhusen M. Siddiki, Prop Dcit, Circle-9 Of Sunmoon Roadways 6/D/1, Vs Ahmedabad Pursottam Estate, Nr. Cozy Hotel, Ranipur Patia, Sarkhej Road, Narol, Ahmedabad-382405 Pan No.Arsps3765P

191 ITR 667 wherein Hon’ble Apex Court after referring to Rule 6DD of the Rules held as follows: 7. In our opinion, there is little merit in this contention. Section 40A(3) must not be read in isolation or to the exclusion of Rule 6DD. The Section must be read along with the Rule. If read together, it will