BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

57 results for “TDS”+ Section 10Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai223Bangalore211Delhi179Kolkata166Chennai62Hyderabad61Ahmedabad57Pune32Lucknow13Cuttack13Jaipur13Chandigarh10Indore9Varanasi6Karnataka6Agra5Nagpur5Cochin3Patna2Allahabad2Rajkot2Dehradun2Visakhapatnam1Guwahati1Jabalpur1Kerala1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 10B37Section 143(3)35Addition to Income34Section 92C33Disallowance26Deduction25Transfer Pricing24Section 1022Section 10(108)18Section 143(1)

THE DCIT(OSD)RANGE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. DISHMAN PHARMACEUTICALS & CHEMICALS LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, we allow appeal of the assessee and delete penalty confirmed by the ld

ITA 692/AHD/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 May 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: Shri R.P. Maurya, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92BSection 92C

TDS has been deposited prior to the due date of filing of return, then no disallowance has to be made. The ld.CIT(A) has rightly deled the disallowance, and we do not find any error in this ground of appeal. It is rejected. ITA No.692 /Ahd/2011 and 7 Others ACIT Vs. Dishman Pharmaceuticals & Chemicals 26 25. In the result

THE ACIT,(OSD)RANGE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. DISHMAN PHARMACEUTICALS & CHEMICALS LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

Showing 1–20 of 57 · Page 1 of 3

13
Exemption13
Section 143(2)12

In the result, we allow appeal of the assessee and delete penalty confirmed by the ld

ITA 2957/AHD/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 May 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: Shri R.P. Maurya, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92BSection 92C

TDS has been deposited prior to the due date of filing of return, then no disallowance has to be made. The ld.CIT(A) has rightly deled the disallowance, and we do not find any error in this ground of appeal. It is rejected. ITA No.692 /Ahd/2011 and 7 Others ACIT Vs. Dishman Pharmaceuticals & Chemicals 26 25. In the result

THE DCIT(OSD)RANGE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. DISHMAN PHARMACEUTICALS & CHEMICALS LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, we allow appeal of the assessee and delete penalty confirmed by the ld

ITA 817/AHD/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 May 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: Shri R.P. Maurya, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92BSection 92C

TDS has been deposited prior to the due date of filing of return, then no disallowance has to be made. The ld.CIT(A) has rightly deled the disallowance, and we do not find any error in this ground of appeal. It is rejected. ITA No.692 /Ahd/2011 and 7 Others ACIT Vs. Dishman Pharmaceuticals & Chemicals 26 25. In the result

DISHMAN PHARMACEUTICALS & CHEMICALS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,(OSD)RANGE-1,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, we allow appeal of the assessee and delete penalty confirmed by the ld

ITA 773/AHD/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 May 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: Shri R.P. Maurya, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92BSection 92C

TDS has been deposited prior to the due date of filing of return, then no disallowance has to be made. The ld.CIT(A) has rightly deled the disallowance, and we do not find any error in this ground of appeal. It is rejected. ITA No.692 /Ahd/2011 and 7 Others ACIT Vs. Dishman Pharmaceuticals & Chemicals 26 25. In the result

DISHMAN PHARMACEUTICALS & CHEMICALS LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, (OSD),RANGE-1,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, we allow appeal of the assessee and delete penalty confirmed by the ld

ITA 3086/AHD/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 May 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: Shri R.P. Maurya, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92BSection 92C

TDS has been deposited prior to the due date of filing of return, then no disallowance has to be made. The ld.CIT(A) has rightly deled the disallowance, and we do not find any error in this ground of appeal. It is rejected. ITA No.692 /Ahd/2011 and 7 Others ACIT Vs. Dishman Pharmaceuticals & Chemicals 26 25. In the result

PENTAIR VALVES & CONTROLS INDIA PVT. LTD.( FORMERLY KNOWN AS TYCO VALVES & CONTROLS INDIA PVT. LTD.),BARODA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE- 4,, BARODA

In the result, ITA No.1312/Ahd/2012 is dismissed

ITA 1003/AHD/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradipkumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Bandish Soparkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Mahsh Shah, CIT-DR
Section 10BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

10B is concerned, the issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in assessee’s own case in Asstt.Year 2003-04 as well as by ITAT’s order in the Asstt.Year 2004-05 also. It is also pertinent to mention that the Department has mentioned incorrect amount in its ground

TYCO VALVES & CONTROLS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE- 4,, BARODA

In the result, ITA No.1312/Ahd/2012 is dismissed

ITA 1309/AHD/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradipkumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Bandish Soparkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Mahsh Shah, CIT-DR
Section 10BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

10B is concerned, the issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in assessee’s own case in Asstt.Year 2003-04 as well as by ITAT’s order in the Asstt.Year 2004-05 also. It is also pertinent to mention that the Department has mentioned incorrect amount in its ground

THE ACIT, CIRCLE- 4,, BARODA vs. TYCO VALVES & CONTROLS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., BARODA

In the result, ITA No.1312/Ahd/2012 is dismissed

ITA 1312/AHD/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradipkumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Bandish Soparkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Mahsh Shah, CIT-DR
Section 10BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

10B is concerned, the issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in assessee’s own case in Asstt.Year 2003-04 as well as by ITAT’s order in the Asstt.Year 2004-05 also. It is also pertinent to mention that the Department has mentioned incorrect amount in its ground

TYCO VALVES & CONTROLS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT, BARODA CIR- 4,, BARODA

In the result, Assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2993/AHD/2011[2007-08-]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Jan 2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.AdvFor Respondent: Shri Mahesh Shah, CIT-DR
Section 10BSection 144C(5)Section 920(2)

sections namely, Activities carried out in relation to valves, components, etc.; Provision of support services; Receipt of Management charge; Provision of design related services and Reimbursements.” ACIT vs. M/s.Tyco Valves & Controls (I) Pvt.Ltd.vs. DCIT Asst.Year - 2007-08 3.5. The Assessee for benchmarking its transactions classified under the head in relation to valves, component etc in connection with the determination

ASCENT FINECHEM PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 440/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl. Ita No(S) Asset. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent (S) Appellant Respondent 1-2 438-439/Ahd/2018 2008-09 Ascent Finechem Pvt. A.C.I.T, Circle- & Ltd., 1(1)(2), 2009-10 11, Ground Floor, Ahmedabad. Suryarath, B/H. Whilte House, Panchawati, Ahmedabad-380015. Pan No.Aabca6349Q

For Appellant: Shri P.F. Jain, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Dev, Dr. D.R
Section 10B

10B of the Act. Thus, in the absence of necessary details, the AO cannot arbitrarily allocate all the expenses of trading unit to the 100% EOU. In our view, the AO should have referred the data of the assessee of the earlier assessment years before allocating the expenses of trading unit to the export oriented unit

ASCENT FINECHEM PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT., CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 438/AHD/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jul 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl. Ita No(S) Asset. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent (S) Appellant Respondent 1-2 438-439/Ahd/2018 2008-09 Ascent Finechem Pvt. A.C.I.T, Circle- & Ltd., 1(1)(2), 2009-10 11, Ground Floor, Ahmedabad. Suryarath, B/H. Whilte House, Panchawati, Ahmedabad-380015. Pan No.Aabca6349Q

For Appellant: Shri P.F. Jain, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Dev, Dr. D.R
Section 10B

10B of the Act. Thus, in the absence of necessary details, the AO cannot arbitrarily allocate all the expenses of trading unit to the 100% EOU. In our view, the AO should have referred the data of the assessee of the earlier assessment years before allocating the expenses of trading unit to the export oriented unit

ASCENT FINECHEM PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT., CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 439/AHD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl. Ita No(S) Asset. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent (S) Appellant Respondent 1-2 438-439/Ahd/2018 2008-09 Ascent Finechem Pvt. A.C.I.T, Circle- & Ltd., 1(1)(2), 2009-10 11, Ground Floor, Ahmedabad. Suryarath, B/H. Whilte House, Panchawati, Ahmedabad-380015. Pan No.Aabca6349Q

For Appellant: Shri P.F. Jain, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Dev, Dr. D.R
Section 10B

10B of the Act. Thus, in the absence of necessary details, the AO cannot arbitrarily allocate all the expenses of trading unit to the 100% EOU. In our view, the AO should have referred the data of the assessee of the earlier assessment years before allocating the expenses of trading unit to the export oriented unit

THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. GUJARAT MICROWAX LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both of the Appeals of Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2682/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 10BSection 143(3)Section 92E

10B to 10E, 'transaction' includes a number of closely related transactions" and that "Thus, the closely linked transactions can, in a given situation, be components of single composite transaction". Their Lordships have then added that "The assessee would, however, have to prove that although each sale and each provision of service is priced separately, they were all provided under

THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. GUJARAT MICROWAX LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both of the Appeals of Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2683/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 10BSection 143(3)Section 92E

10B to 10E, 'transaction' includes a number of closely related transactions" and that "Thus, the closely linked transactions can, in a given situation, be components of single composite transaction". Their Lordships have then added that "The assessee would, however, have to prove that although each sale and each provision of service is priced separately, they were all provided under

CHHAGANLAL BHIMABHAI DANGODARA,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2), BHAVNAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed…”

ITA 2547/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Dr. Kumarbhai R Pandya, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Mamta Singh, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(108)Section 250

section 10(10B), the assessee now seeks exemption of such compensation. We find that the assessee filed the claim before the Ld. CIT(A) and since the income of the assessee is not taxable, the assessee is eligible for the refund of the TDS

CHHAGANLAL BHIMABHAI DANGODARA,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2), BHAVNAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed…”

ITA 2548/AHD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Mar 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Dr. Kumarbhai R Pandya, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Mamta Singh, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(108)Section 250

section 10(10B), the assessee now seeks exemption of such compensation. We find that the assessee filed the claim before the Ld. CIT(A) and since the income of the assessee is not taxable, the assessee is eligible for the refund of the TDS

JAYESHKUMAR TULSIDAS SUTARIA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD 7(2)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2388/AHD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Feb 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Gohil, ARFor Respondent: Shri Veerabadram Vislavath, Sr. DR
Section 10(100)Section 10(108)Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)Section 246ASection 250(6)Section 251

section 10(10B), the assessee now seeks exemption of such compensation. We find that the assessee filed the claim before the Ld. CIT(A) and since the income of the assessee is not taxable, the assessee is eligible for the refund of the TDS

JAYESHKUMAR TULSIDAS SUTARIA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD 7(2)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2387/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Gohil, ARFor Respondent: Shri Veerabadram Vislavath, Sr. DR
Section 10(100)Section 10(108)Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)Section 246ASection 250(6)Section 251

section 10(10B), the assessee now seeks exemption of such compensation. We find that the assessee filed the claim before the Ld. CIT(A) and since the income of the assessee is not taxable, the assessee is eligible for the refund of the TDS

SUMAN NANDLAL RAVAL,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD 1, GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2389/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Gohil, ARFor Respondent: Shri Veerabadram Vislavath, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(108)Section 143(1)Section 249(3)Section 250

section 10(10B), the assessee now seeks exemption of such compensation. We find that the assessee filed the ITA Nos. 2389 & 2390/Ahd/2025 Suman N Raval Vs. ITO Asst. Year: 2020-21 & 2021-22 - 5– claim before the Ld. CIT(A) and since the income of the assessee is not taxable, the assessee is eligible for the refund of the TDS

SUMAN NANDLAL RAVAL,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD 1, GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2390/AHD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Feb 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Gohil, ARFor Respondent: Shri Veerabadram Vislavath, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(108)Section 143(1)Section 249(3)Section 250

section 10(10B), the assessee now seeks exemption of such compensation. We find that the assessee filed the ITA Nos. 2389 & 2390/Ahd/2025 Suman N Raval Vs. ITO Asst. Year: 2020-21 & 2021-22 - 5– claim before the Ld. CIT(A) and since the income of the assessee is not taxable, the assessee is eligible for the refund of the TDS