BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 50C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai172Delhi151Jaipur48Hyderabad47Ahmedabad39Indore33Kolkata32Chennai28Nagpur19Raipur18Surat17Bangalore15Pune14Chandigarh11Lucknow10Guwahati9Rajkot9Jodhpur8Visakhapatnam3Karnataka3Patna3Agra3Cochin1Amritsar1Allahabad1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)8Section 143(3)3Section 1473Section 1483Capital Gains3Section 50C(2)2Section 682Section 1432Section 292B2Addition to Income

SH. KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA,MATHURA vs. I.T.O., WARD-3(2), MATHURA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 227/AGR/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra13 Feb 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: : Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment Year: 2009-10

Section 143(3)Section 24Section 24(3)Section 257Section 68

50C) Total 1,73,10,000 1,82,44,500 1,34,08,000 1,41,66,357 5.11.3 In view of the chart made on the previous page, the value of sale consideration of land owned by the assessee(appellant) and flats constructed thereon as received by him for the purpose computation of capital gain comes to Rs. 1

SANJANA GUPTA,JHANSI vs. ITO-WARD-2(3)(1) JHANSI, JHANSI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

2
ITA 433/AGR/2025[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Agra21 Jan 2026AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshsanjana Gupta, Vs. Ito, 130, Gudri Bazar, Jhansi Ward-2(3)(1), Jhansi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Awbpg1536E Assessee By : Smt Prathna Jalan, Ca Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 19/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 21/01/2026 O R D E R

For Appellant: Smt Prathna Jalan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 254Section 50C(2)

50C(2) of the Act was made by ld AO. The ld DVO valued the property at ₹40, 64, 800/-. The differential sum i.e. value determined by the ld DVO and the value reported by the assessee was sought to be added as income of the assessee under the head “income from capital gains” and the same was taxed

SHRI SIYARAM YADAV,MAINPURI vs. ITO 2(5), MAINPURI

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 117/AGR/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra25 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 292BSection 50CSection 68

1. That reopening of assessment u/s 147 was illegal. 2. That assessment completed without the service and issue of notice u/s 143(2) subsequent to return filed before the A.O. is illegal, without jurisdiction and ab-initio void. I.T.A No. 117/Agra/2017 2 3. That saving bank accounts held with Bank of India, Madhau, Mainpuri was duly disclosed in the return