BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 202clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi586Karnataka494Mumbai412Bangalore128Ahmedabad119Chennai114Jaipur99Kolkata77Rajkot60Hyderabad48Chandigarh36Nagpur31Surat30Indore29Raipur28Pune28Lucknow19Cuttack17Calcutta16Telangana15Guwahati12Amritsar10Ranchi9Visakhapatnam8Jodhpur7SC5Rajasthan4Agra3Patna3Dehradun3Cochin2Allahabad2Orissa1Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 1476Section 1484Section 2(24)4Section 683Section 142Section 201(1)2Addition to Income2

DCIT CIRCLE-2(1), GWALIOR vs. B.P. EDIBLE OIL PVT LTD, GWALIOR

ITA 347/AGR/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenaassessment Year: 2011-12

Section 133(6)

202/-. (3). Following requires verification of the genuineness and correctness: (a). Salary and wages paid amounting to Rs.11,34,125/- (b). Creditors amounting to Rs.1,31,15,424/- (4). The assessee has shown income of Rs.5,32,602/- even when gross receipts of the company has increased from 7,16,66,316/- to Rs.12,79,02,891/- which requires detailed

NAVEEN GULU MULANI,AGRA vs. ITO, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 94/AGR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra03 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 14
Section 147
Section 148
Section 2(24)
Section 68

Section 2(24)/14 of the Income Tax Act, liable to be annulled; that while sustaining the addition at Rs.47,60,004/-, the learned CIT (Appeals) has not appreciated the facts and the submissions before him. 4. He has argued that the additions made of Rs.47,60,004/- u/s 68 and the addition of Rs.5,04,000/- made under

M/S. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION,ETAWAH vs. DCIT(TDS), AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 207/AGR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra11 Oct 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal

Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

68,991/-, while the assessee had charged TDS @ 2.25%, worth Rs.41,541/-; that the AO had treated the contractors as having no PANs and had worked out the short deduction at Rs.3,27,460/-; and that after correction of PANs, there remained no short deduction and the demand of Rs.4,17,508/- stood revised to that of Rs.2