Search: reassessment u/s 147

10 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur32 Delhi26 Mumbai23 Pune19 Chennai13 Agra10 Hyderabad10 Kolkata7 Indore7 Amritsar6 Nagpur3 Ahmedabad3 Bangalore3 Surat2 Chandigarh2 Raipur2 Jabalpur1 SC1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 153D17 Section 143(1)15 Section 153A11 Addition to Income10 Section 271D9 Section 143(3)9 Penalty9 Disallowance9 Section 1328

DIXIT RICE MILL ,AURAIYA vs. DCIT, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of assessee is treated as allowed for statistical

ITA 373/AGR/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra10 Jan 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 143(1)Section 246Section 246ASection 36

u/s 143(1) being bad in law is liable to be quashed. 4. Because in any view of the matter, no opportunity was provided to the assessee, by the CPC, before making such disallowance and therefore the disallowance being made is against the principle of natural justice and bad in law and hence liable to be deleted. 5. Because

SANSKAR NAGAR,JHANSI vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR

Appeals stands allowed

DIXIT RICE MILL ,AURAIYA vs. DCIT, BENGALURU

SANSKAR NAGAR,JHANSI vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR

DIXIT RICE MILL ,AURAIYA vs. DCIT, BENGALURU

SANSKAR NAGAR,JHANSI vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR

S G COMMERCIAL,JHANSI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KANPUR

S G COMMERCIAL,JHANSI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME, AGRA

S G COMMERCIAL,JHANSI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KANPUR

S G COMMERCIAL,JHANSI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KANPUR

S G COMMERCIAL,JHANSI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KANPUR

S G COMMERCIAL,JHANSI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA

S G COMMERCIAL,JHANSI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA

S G COMMERCIAL,JHANSI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA