BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 127clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi540Mumbai244Jaipur146Bangalore117Chandigarh94Hyderabad85Raipur54Ahmedabad50Kolkata48Chennai38Pune37Lucknow35Telangana24Indore23Guwahati22Amritsar22Nagpur21Surat21Patna20Jodhpur18Cochin15Rajkot12Dehradun8Visakhapatnam7Cuttack7Agra5Allahabad4Orissa2Rajasthan1SC1Varanasi1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 14810Section 1448Addition to Income5Section 1474Cash Deposit4Section 143(3)2Section 682Reassessment2Reopening of Assessment

A.C.I.T.,CENTRAL CIRCLE, AGRA vs. M/S WELCOME COIR INDUSTRIES LTD.,, NEW DELHI

ITA 266/AGR/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Oct 2017AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 127Section 133ASection 144Section 148

section 124, nor sustainable under law, having been passed without jurisdiction in view of a defective order passed u/s 127 of the Act. 15. The CIT(A) cannot be said to have gone wrong in observing that the jurisdiction of the assessee Company was never transferred u/s 127 of the Act to the DCIT/ACIT(Central Circle), Agra and thus

CHANDRA PRAKASH GOPLANI,BENGALURU vs. ITO 2(1)(1), AGRA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 166/AGR/2023[2012-13]Status: Disposed
2
Limitation/Time-bar2
ITAT Agra
29 Jan 2025
AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 253(3)

reassessment order dated29.11.2019passed by Assessing Officer u/s.144 r.w.s. 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in the memo of appeal filed with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Agra Bench, Agra reads as under : “1- BECAUSE the proceedings initiated u/s 147 and the notice issued u/s 148 is invalid, wrong, illegal, arbitrary, against

CHAND KHAN,SADA SHIV NAGAR vs. ITO WARD 1(2) , CITY CENTER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 109/AGR/2024[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Jan 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 144Section 147

127 ITR Page 807 (Karnataka HC) Held: One the assessee disclosed the source as having comes from the withdrawals made on a given date from a given bank, it was not open to the revenue to examine as to what the assessee did with that money that can not chose to disbelieve the pele of the assessee mearly only surmise

SAROJ,MAINPURI vs. I.T.O WARD 2(5), MAINPURI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 218/AGR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra14 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Sudhir Kumarassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148

reassessment proceedings. The assessee in response thereof submitted bank statement, but failed to furnish any evidence regarding source of cash deposits made by her in her saving bank account. The Assessing Officer issued show cause notice dated 02.09.2019 u/s. 144 to the assessee,but the assessee did not comply. Assessee thereafter submitted reply before the Assessing Officer and submitted that

ANIL KUMAR AGARWAL,AGRA vs. DCIT 2(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 101/AGR/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra19 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Anil Kumar Agarwal, Vs. Dy. Cit, 44, R. S. Residency, Circle-2(1)(1), Dayal Bagh, Agra, Up Agra (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aampa3335J Assessee By : Shri Rajni Kant Verma, Adv Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 17/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 19/11/2025

For Appellant: Shri Rajni Kant Verma, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 68

u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated by the Assessing Officer, DCIT, Circle-2(1)(1), Agra (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’). 2. The only issue to be decided on merits in this appeal is as to whether the Learned JCIT(Appeals) was justified in confirming the addition