Search: reassessment

7 results for “reassessment”+ Section 270clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)14 Section 1488 Addition to Income7 Section 2636 Section 1475 Section 142(1)4 Reassessment4 Section 69A2 Section 115B2 Section 68

M/S RADHARANI JEWELLERS LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AGRA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7/AGR/2026[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra02 Apr 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Anurag Singha, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 69A

reassessment proceedings, the Assessee explained that the jewellery belonged to the company and had been sent for repolishing / job work to M/s Vijay Enterprises, Rajkot. The transaction was duly recorded in the books of accounts and supported by documentary evidences. However, the Learned AO rejected the explanation mainly on the ground that Form - 403 was generated after interception and concluded

M/S RADHARANI JEWELLERS LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AGRA

M/S RADHARANI JEWELLERS LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AGRA

M/S RADHARANI JEWELLERS LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AGRA

RAJ SINGH,MATHURA vs. ITO-3(3), MATHURA

M/S VERMA SERVICE STATION,FIROZABAD vs. D.C.I.T., RANGE-5, FIROZABAD

MANOJ KUMAR AGARWAL,FARUKHABAD vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, FARRUKHABAD

MANOJ KUMAR AGARWAL,FARRUKHABAD vs. DCIT CIRCLE-4(2)(1) FARRUKHABAD, FARRUKHABAD

VARDAN CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,GWALIOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3), GWALIOR