Search: reassessment | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “reassessment”+ Section 150clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi712 Mumbai460 Bangalore276 Jaipur216 Chennai194 Hyderabad125 Ahmedabad118 Pune85 Chandigarh82 Kolkata64 Nagpur57 Indore50 Raipur47 Amritsar45 Rajkot44 Allahabad36 Ranchi36 Surat34 Lucknow30 Telangana29 Visakhapatnam27 Cochin26 Guwahati25 Cuttack22 Dehradun15 Karnataka12 Patna10 SC8 Agra7 Rajasthan2 Orissa2 Jodhpur2 Uttarakhand1 Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 14819 Section 14711 Section 1518 Section 143(1)7 Addition to Income7 Section 695 Disallowance4 Reopening of Assessment3 Natural Justice3 Section 144

DIXIT RICE MILL ,AURAIYA vs. DCIT, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of assessee is treated as allowed for statistical

ITA 373/AGR/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra10 Jan 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 143(1)Section 246Section 246ASection 36

reassessment or recomputation under section 147 or section 150; (c) an order under section 154 or section 155 having the effect

PAWAN AGRAWAL,MATHURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3)(1), MATHURA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 386/AGR/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed

2

ITAT Agra

26 Nov 2025

AY 2020-21

For Appellant: \nShri M. M. Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: \nShri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR

Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 151

reassessment under section 148 of\nthe Act. The said approval cannot be granted in a mechanical manner as it acts\nas a linkage between the facts considered and conclusion reached. In the\ninstant case, merely appending the phrase \"Yes\" does not appropriately align\nwith the mandate of Section 151 of the Act as it fails to set out any degree

SMT. GARIMA MEHTA,GWALIOR vs. I.T.O., WARD-1(2), GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 343/AGR/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra11 Jul 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 10ASection 69

150-154. Para 2.2 thereof read as follows: “2.2 A Software Technology Park (STP) may be set up by the Central Government, State Governments, public or private sector undertakings or any combination thereof. An STP may be an individual unit by itself or it may be one of such units located in an area designated as STP Complex

PREMWATI SUMAN,AGRA vs. ITO-1(3), AGRA

In the result both appeals are allowed

ITA 393/AGR/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Mar 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenasmt. Premwati Suman, Vs.. Income Tax Officer- 1(3), 1/1, Hig Flats, Sanjay Place, Agra. Agra. Pan: Bnvps9819N (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri. Ranjeet Suman, Vs.. Income Tax Officer- 1(3), 1/1, Hig Flats, Sanjay Place, Agra. Agra. Pan: Bnlps9622P (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 151

reassessment. Accordingly, question no.1 is answered in favour of assessee and against the department. (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2008-09) 14. The learned Sr. D.R placed heavy reliance to the Judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court and CIT vs. SafetagInternational India Pvt. Ltd.(supra) perusal of the case reveals that it nowhere lays down any proposition of law for which

RAJ SINGH,MATHURA vs. ITO-3(3), MATHURA

In the result appeal is allowed

ITA 408/AGR/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Mar 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenashri. Raj Singh, Vs.. Income Tax Officer- 3(3), Village- Kharaut Chhata, Mathura Mathura. Pan: Akvpr1777Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 144Section 148Section 151

reassessment. Accordingly, question no.1 is answered in favour of assessee and against the department. 13. The learned Sr. D.R placed heavy reliance to the Judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court ‘CIT vs. Safetag International India Pvt. Ltd.’, (supra). The perusal of the case reveals that it nowhere lays down any proposition of law for which the learned

SAPNA CHAUHAN,ETAWAH vs. ITO, ETAWAH

In the result,both the appeals in ITA No

ITA 137/AGR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Mar 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 234B

Reassessment Reasons to believe fishing enquiry impugned notice clearly indicates that the ld. AO merely wanted to know the details of sources of funds invested by the assessee in purchasing a flat ld. AO had no basis to reasonably entertain a belief that any part of income of the assessee had escaped assessment and that such escapement was by reasons

SHYAMA SHYAM INFRADEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,AGRA vs. ITO 2(1)(2), AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 503/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra23 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshshyama Shyam Vs. Ito, Infradevelopers Pvt Ltd, Ward-2(1)(2), Khasra No. 961, Bhahistabad, Agra Sikandra, Agra (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aatcs9899R Assessee By : Shri Gaurav Agarwal, Ca Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 20/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 21/01/2026 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR

Section 147Section 148

150/-. During the course of re-assessment proceedings, the assessee furnished the following documents on the following dates before the ld AO: – Sl No. Date of Details of submission submission 1 17-01-2023 Acknowledgement, Reply to notice, ITR, Computation of Total Income, sale deeds, Audit Report, P&L account, Balance sheet. 2. 22-04-2023 Acknowledgement, Reply to notice