SMT. SARLA DEVI,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALIGARH

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

unexplained money. In my firm view, the angle of concealment is more than established, and, therefore, I uphold the penalty of Rs.9,44,043/- Grounds of appeal Nos.1 to10 are dismissed.” 14. Heard. The matter, it is seen, is squarely covered by order dated 19.12.2017, passed by the Division Bench, in ‘Sachin Arora vs. ITO’, and other connected cases

BIPIN BABU AGRAWAL,MATHURA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AGRA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed