BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 57clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai456Delhi406Jaipur118Bangalore115Ahmedabad111Raipur60Hyderabad60Chennai51Indore46Kolkata45Rajkot39Pune37Surat37Amritsar34Chandigarh33Allahabad31Lucknow22Visakhapatnam17Nagpur17Guwahati13Cochin11Varanasi7Cuttack5Dehradun4Agra2Jodhpur2Patna2Ranchi2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)6Section 1483Section 271(1)2

BLM HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED ,FARRUKHABAD vs. DCIT CIRCLE 4(2)(1), FARRUKHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 20/AGR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra05 Feb 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: \nShri Swaran Singh, CAFor Respondent: \nShri Shailendra Shrivastava, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter\nreferred to as 'the Act') dated 15.04.2019 by the Assessing Officer, DCIT,\nCircle-4 (2)(1), Farrukhabad (hereinafter referred to as 'Id. AO').\n2.\nThough the assessee had raised several grounds of appeal, the only\neffective issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the Learned

TEJ SINGH,MATHURA vs. ITO 1(3)(4), MATHURA

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 8/AGR/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra26 Sept 2023AY 2009-10
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148

271(1)(b) were not answered by the appellant. Thereafter, a show- cause notice under section 144 was issued by the AO. on 16.11.2016 and on its non-service through the speed post, ITI was deputed to serve it personally on the appellant. Vide his report dated 06.12.2016, the ITI has reported that Shri Tej Singh had expired