BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 56(2)(x)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi137Mumbai111Jaipur49Raipur28Pune20Ahmedabad19Chennai17Bangalore17Rajkot15Chandigarh13Hyderabad12Nagpur8Kolkata7Lucknow7Guwahati5Allahabad5Indore4Surat3Jodhpur2Agra2Patna1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)5Section 143(3)3Section 2743Section 1472Penalty2

TAHIR KHAN,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 468/AGR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Agra15 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 292BSection 56(2)(vii)

56(2)(vii) of the 'Act' being on account of deeming fiction cannot be a valid foundation for levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the 'Act, as such addition is purely notional and involves no element of concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. 7. BECAUSE, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining penalty in respect of enhancement

MAMMON CONCAST PRIVATE LIMITED,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1), AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 96/AGR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra04 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13]

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271(1)(c)

271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to ‘the Act’) dated 16.03.2024. 2. At the outset in this case, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the quantum appeal in this case has already been quashed vide order dated 12.02.2025 in ITA No.77/Del/2023. Hence, he submitted that the penalty does not survive