Search: penalty u/s 271

10 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 56clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14723 Section 50C21 Section 56(2)(vii)15 Section 271(1)(c)8 Section 1488 Section 69A8 Reopening of Assessment8 Reassessment7 Undisclosed Income

TAHIR KHAN,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 468/AGR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Agra15 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 292BSection 56(2)(vii)

56(2)(vii) of the Act. Based on the above additions, the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings and imposed penalty of Rs.83,45,158/- u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. The aforesaid additions made by the Assessing Officer stood confirmed by learned CIT(A) in assessee’s quantum appeal and in second appeal filed by the Assessee, the Tribunal

TAHIR KHAN,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3)(1), JHANSI

TAHIR KHAN,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3)(1), JHANSI

BHAGIRATH PAKHARIA,JHANSI vs. WARD 2 (3)(1), JHANSI

POONAM GUPTA,GWALIOR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), GWALIOR

BHAGIRATH PAKHARIA,JHANSI vs. WARD 2 (3)(1), JHANSI

BHAGIRATH PAKHARIA,JHANSI vs. WARD 2 (3)(1), JHANSI

BHAGIRATH PAKHRIA,JHANSI vs. WARD 2 (3)(1), JHANSI

BHAGIRATH PAKHARIA,JHANSI vs. WARD 2 (3)(1), JHANSI

BHAGIRATH PAKHARIA,JHANSI vs. WARD 2 (3)(1), JHANSI

BHAGIRATH PAKHARIA,JHANSI vs. WARD 2 (3)(1), JHANSI

MAMMON CONCAST PRIVATE LIMITED,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1), AGRA