Search: penalty u/s 271

12 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 48clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 10(38)20 Section 271(1)(c)15 Addition to Income10 Section 2749 Section 2717 Section 143(3)6 Section 696 Exemption6 Section 153A5

SMT. SARLA DEVI,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALIGARH

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 70/AGR/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 68Section 69Section 69C

section and therefore it is a vague notice, which is attributable to a patent non-application of mind on the part of the assessing authority.”; and that: “There can be no doubt that penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) of the Act is levied for concealing particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of such Income, which

MS/ BHOLE BABA MILK FOOD INDUSTRIES,AGRA vs. THE A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(1), AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

SMT. SARLA DEVI,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALIGARH

MS/ BHOLE BABA MILK FOOD INDUSTRIES,AGRA vs. THE A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(1), AGRA

SMT. SARLA DEVI,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALIGARH

MS/ BHOLE BABA MILK FOOD INDUSTRIES,AGRA vs. THE A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(1), AGRA

SH. SACHIN ARORA,MATHURA vs. I.T.O.-3(4), MATHURA

ZILA SAHKARI BANK LTD,JHANSI vs. DCIT -2(3)(1), JHANSI

K P ENTERPRISES,ETAWAH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , FIROZABAD

PREM LATA VERMA ,ALIGARH, UTTAR PRADESH vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 4(1)(1), ALIGARH, ALIGARH, UTTAR PRADESH

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S RAKESH SHIVHARE & NISHA MITTAL, MORENA

A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S VANDANA JAIN & RAMA BANSAL, MORENA

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2,, AGRA vs. M/S SAKSHI TAIRI & CHHAYA BATTAD, MORENA

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S SHYAM SUNDER & MANISH TAORI, MORENA

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S SUNIL KUMAR MITTAL & MAMTA MITTAL, MORENA

SMT. GARIMA MEHTA,GWALIOR vs. I.T.O., WARD-1(2), GWALIOR