Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 276C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi59 Mumbai50 Pune15 Kolkata9 Ahmedabad8 Jaipur7 Lucknow7 Chennai6 Patna6 Agra4 Karnataka3 Indore2 Rajkot2 Ranchi2 SC2 Chandigarh2 Jodhpur1 Telangana1 Hyderabad1 Panaji1 Bangalore1 Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)11 Section 2749 Section 2717 Section 271(1)4 Penalty3 Section 44A2 Addition to Income2 Cash Deposit2 Undisclosed Income

SMT. SARLA DEVI,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALIGARH

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 70/AGR/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 68Section 69Section 69C

u/s 271(1)(c) which has to be met by him, the observation of the AO in the assessment order alongside his action of non striking off the irrelevant clause in the notice was held be rendering the notice not complying with the principles of natural justice. The Bench thus deleted the penalty. 30. Again, a similar issue came

MS/ BHOLE BABA MILK FOOD INDUSTRIES,AGRA vs. THE A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(1), AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

SMT. SARLA DEVI,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALIGARH

MS/ BHOLE BABA MILK FOOD INDUSTRIES,AGRA vs. THE A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(1), AGRA

SMT. SARLA DEVI,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALIGARH

MS/ BHOLE BABA MILK FOOD INDUSTRIES,AGRA vs. THE A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(1), AGRA

SH. SACHIN ARORA,MATHURA vs. I.T.O.-3(4), MATHURA

ZILA SAHKARI BANK LTD,JHANSI vs. DCIT -2(3)(1), JHANSI