Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 249(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 2713 Section 249(2)3 Penalty3 Limitation/Time-bar3 Condonation of Delay3 Section 2502 Section 249(3)2 Section 249(4)2 Section 271(1)(c)2

M/S KRISHAK SAHAKARI SHAKKAR KARKHANA,GUNA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-3, GWALIOR

In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal is treated as allowed

ITA 145/AGR/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Jan 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

Section 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty of Rs. 5,54,249/- levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not justified. 2. That, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, and in any view of the matter, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in dismissing the appeal as non maintainable because there was delay

M/S AMBAH CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY,MORENA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, MORENA

In the result, both the revenue appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

M/S KRISHAK SAHAKARI SHAKKAR KARKHANA,GUNA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-3, GWALIOR

M/S AMBAH CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY,MORENA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, MORENA

M/S KRISHAK SAHAKARI SHAKKAR KARKHANA,GUNA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-3, GWALIOR

M/S AMBAH CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY,MORENA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, MORENA

M/S AMBAH CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY,MORENA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, MORENA

HARSH SALUJA,MATHURA vs. ITO 3(2), MATHURA