SHYAM SINGH YADAV,GWALIOR vs. ITO 2(2), GWL, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Shyam Singh Yadav, Vs. Ito, Opp. Doordarshan Kendra, Ward-2(2), Thatipur Gaon, Morar, Gwalior, Mp Gwalior (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Abhpy8702B Assessee By : Shri S. C. Jain, Adv Revenue By: Shri Shalenndra Srivastava, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 05/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 05/02/2025

u/s 147 r.w.s 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) dated 04.12.2019 by the Assessing Officer, ITO, Ward-3(2), Gwalior (hereinafter referred to as „ld. AO‟). 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :- “1. That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] erred in passing an ex parte

M/S AMBAH CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY,MORENA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, MORENA

In the result, both the revenue appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

24, Joy Builders M.P. – 476 111 Colony, Near Rafael Tower, Old Palasia, Indore M.P. – 452 018 PAN : AABAA5173A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri S.N. Agarwal, CA Department by Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR Date of hearing 18/02/2026 Date of pronouncement 18/02/2026 ORDER PER SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER These appeals have been preferred against the impugned order dated 27.11.2025 passed

M/S AMBAH CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY,MORENA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, MORENA

In the result, both the revenue appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

24, Joy Builders M.P. – 476 111 Colony, Near Rafael Tower, Old Palasia, Indore M.P. – 452 018 PAN : AABAA5173A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri S.N. Agarwal, CA Department by Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR Date of hearing 18/02/2026 Date of pronouncement 18/02/2026 ORDER PER SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER These appeals have been preferred against the impugned order dated 27.11.2025 passed

TEJ SINGH,MATHURA vs. ITO 1(3)(4), MATHURA

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

271(1)(b) were not answered by the appellant. Thereafter, a show- cause notice under section 144 was issued by the AO. on 16.11.2016 and on its non-service through the speed post, ITI was deputed to serve it personally on the appellant. Vide his report dated 06.12.2016, the ITI has reported that Shri Tej Singh had expired