Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Addition to Income7 Section 44A5 Penalty5 Section 1474 Section 1454 Section 1443 Section 1543 Section 271(1)3 Cash Deposit3

MR. PRAMOD KUMAR KHANDELWAL,AGRA vs. DY.C.I.T.-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed in the terms indicated

ITA 200/AGR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra12 Apr 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 145Section 271(1)Section 44A

234A, 234B and 234C and initiating penalty proceedings U/S 271(1) (c) of I.T. Act, 1961. 7. That the appellate order dated 17tri March, 2016 passed by the learned CIT (A) -I, Agra is against the law and facts of the assessee's case. The appellant also seeks permission to modify and/or adduce any other ground/grounds of appeal

MR. PRAMOD KUMAR KHANDELWAL,AGRA vs. DY.C.I.T.-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed in the terms indicated

ITA 201/AGR/2016[2010-11]Status: Disposed

MR. PRAMOD KUMAR KHANDELWAL,AGRA vs. DY.C.I.T.-1, AGRA

MR. PRAMOD KUMAR KHANDELWAL,AGRA vs. DY.C.I.T.-1, AGRA

MR. PRAMOD KUMAR KHANDELWAL,AGRA vs. DY.C.I.T.-1, AGRA

MR. PRAMOD KUMAR KHANDELWAL,AGRA vs. DY.C.I.T.-1, AGRA

NEERAJ KUMAR,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1)(3), AGRA, AGRA

MANISH KUMAR CHATURVEDI,JHANSI vs. ITO WARD 2(3)(2), JHANSI

SHYAM SINGH YADAV,GWALIOR vs. ITO 2(2), GWL, GWALIOR

MR.AKSHAT DONERIA,GREATER NOIDA vs. ITO-4(1), AGRA

HARSH SALUJA,MATHURA vs. ITO 3(2), MATHURA