Search: penalty u/s 271

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 200clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14712 Section 271C7 Section 271(1)(c)7 Section 1446 Penalty6 Natural Justice5 Addition to Income5 Section 69A3 Section 144B3

M/S KUNJ POWER PROJECTS PVT.LTD,MATHURA vs. ADDL.CIT(TDS) , KANPUR, KANPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 152/AGR/2022[2024-15]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Apr 2025AY 2024-15

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250(6)Section 271CSection 271C(1)(a)Section 276C

u/s. 276C of the Act. Hon'ble\nApex Court in the case of US Technologies International Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT\n(2023) 453 ITR 644 (SC) had analysed the provisions of section 271C of\nthe Act and categorically held that the said section does not impose\npenalty for the default of not depositing TDS deduction to the\nGovernment account. Relevant

TAHIR KHAN,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

M/S KUNJ POWER PROJECTS PVT.LTD,MATHURA vs. ADDL.CIT(TDS) , KANPUR, KANPUR

TAHIR KHAN,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3)(1), JHANSI

M/S KUNJ POWER PROJECTS PVT.LTD,MATHURA vs. ADDL.CIT(TDS) , KANPUR, KANPUR

TAHIR KHAN,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3)(1), JHANSI

JAY SINGH,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, 2(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA

JAY SINGH,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, 2(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA

JAY SINGH,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, 2(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA

MR.AKSHAT DONERIA,GREATER NOIDA vs. ITO-4(1), AGRA