VINOD KUMAR GUPTA,JHANSI vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Section 144B of the Act on 26.03.2022 wherein, loss from house\nproperty of Rs. 52,567/- was disallowed apart from making addition on account\nof unexplained money u/s 69A in respect of credits in the bank account in the\nsum of Rs. 28,20,500 and denying deduction under Chapter VIA to the tune of\nRs. 2,50,000/-. These

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA,JHANSI vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Section 144B of the Act on 26.03.2022 wherein, loss from house\nproperty of Rs. 52,567/- was disallowed apart from making addition on account\nof unexplained money u/s 69A in respect of credits in the bank account in the\nsum of Rs. 28,20,500 and denying deduction under Chapter VIA to the tune of\nRs. 2,50,000/-. These

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA,JHANSI vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing)

Section 144B of the Act on 26.03.2022 wherein, loss from house property of Rs. 52,567/- was disallowed apart from making addition on account of unexplained money u/s 69A in respect of credits in the bank account in the sum of Rs. 28,20,500 and denying deduction under Chapter VIA to the tune of Rs. 2,50,000/-. These

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA,JHANSI vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing)

Section 144B of the Act on 26.03.2022 wherein, loss from house property of Rs. 52,567/- was disallowed apart from making addition on account of unexplained money u/s 69A in respect of credits in the bank account in the sum of Rs. 28,20,500 and denying deduction under Chapter VIA to the tune of Rs. 2,50,000/-. These

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA,JHANSI vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing)

Section 144B of the Act on 26.03.2022 wherein, loss from house property of Rs. 52,567/- was disallowed apart from making addition on account of unexplained money u/s 69A in respect of credits in the bank account in the sum of Rs. 28,20,500 and denying deduction under Chapter VIA to the tune of Rs. 2,50,000/-. These

NEETA AGARWAL,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, 2(1)(2), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh(Through Virtual Hearing) Neeta Agarwal, Vs. Income Tax Officer, E-23, New Agra, Agra Ward-2(1)(2), Agra (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaxpa0936E Assessee By : Shri Amit Goyal, Adv Shri Nitin Goyal, Adv Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 16/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 04/12/2025

penalty u/s 271(1) of I.T.Act, 1961 in the appellant case. 8. That the appeal as well as assessment order are against the law and facts of the case. 9. That the appellant craves the leave to add, amend, alter and/or delete any of the Grounds of Appeal either before or during the course of hearing of appeal

SH. NAVEEN SHIVAHRE,GWALIOR vs. A.C.I.T.CIRCLE-3,, GWALIOR

Appeals stand allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.382/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 3. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.383/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.384/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.318/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 6. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.319/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 7. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.380/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 8. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Shri Naveen Shivhare बनाम/ Acit, Circle-3, M-40, Gandhi Nagar, Gwalior. Gwalior. Vs. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aempg-8216-Z (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Rajendra Sharma, Adv. – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav – Ld. Cit-Dr

20-12-2010. 2. The Ld. AR argued that this year is unabated year and the impugned additions are not based on any incriminating material as found during search. Therefore, the impugned additions are not sustainable as per recent decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (149 Taxmann.com

SH. NAVEEN SHIVAHRE,GWALIOR vs. A.C.I.T.CIRCLE-3,, GWALIOR

Appeals stand allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.382/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 3. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.383/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.384/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.318/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 6. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.319/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 7. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.380/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 8. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Shri Naveen Shivhare बनाम/ Acit, Circle-3, M-40, Gandhi Nagar, Gwalior. Gwalior. Vs. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aempg-8216-Z (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Rajendra Sharma, Adv. – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav – Ld. Cit-Dr

20-12-2010. 2. The Ld. AR argued that this year is unabated year and the impugned additions are not based on any incriminating material as found during search. Therefore, the impugned additions are not sustainable as per recent decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (149 Taxmann.com

SH. NAVEEN SHIVAHRE,GWALIOR vs. A.C.I.T.CIRCLE-3,, GWALIOR

Appeals stand allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.382/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 3. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.383/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.384/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.318/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 6. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.319/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 7. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.380/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 8. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Shri Naveen Shivhare बनाम/ Acit, Circle-3, M-40, Gandhi Nagar, Gwalior. Gwalior. Vs. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aempg-8216-Z (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Rajendra Sharma, Adv. – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav – Ld. Cit-Dr

20-12-2010. 2. The Ld. AR argued that this year is unabated year and the impugned additions are not based on any incriminating material as found during search. Therefore, the impugned additions are not sustainable as per recent decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (149 Taxmann.com

SH. NAVEEN SHIVAHRE,GWALIOR vs. A.C.I.T.CIRCLE-3,, GWALIOR

Appeals stand allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.382/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 3. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.383/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.384/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.318/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 6. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.319/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 7. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.380/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 8. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Shri Naveen Shivhare बनाम/ Acit, Circle-3, M-40, Gandhi Nagar, Gwalior. Gwalior. Vs. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aempg-8216-Z (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Rajendra Sharma, Adv. – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav – Ld. Cit-Dr

20-12-2010. 2. The Ld. AR argued that this year is unabated year and the impugned additions are not based on any incriminating material as found during search. Therefore, the impugned additions are not sustainable as per recent decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (149 Taxmann.com

NAVEEN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-3, GWALIOR

Appeals stand allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.382/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 3. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.383/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.384/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.318/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 6. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.319/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 7. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.380/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 8. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Shri Naveen Shivhare बनाम/ Acit, Circle-3, M-40, Gandhi Nagar, Gwalior. Gwalior. Vs. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aempg-8216-Z (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Rajendra Sharma, Adv. – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav – Ld. Cit-Dr

20-12-2010. 2. The Ld. AR argued that this year is unabated year and the impugned additions are not based on any incriminating material as found during search. Therefore, the impugned additions are not sustainable as per recent decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (149 Taxmann.com

SH. NAVEEN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. A.C.I.T.CIRCLE-3,, GWALIOR

Appeals stand allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.382/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 3. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.383/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.384/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.318/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 6. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.319/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 7. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.380/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 8. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Shri Naveen Shivhare बनाम/ Acit, Circle-3, M-40, Gandhi Nagar, Gwalior. Gwalior. Vs. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aempg-8216-Z (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Rajendra Sharma, Adv. – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav – Ld. Cit-Dr

20-12-2010. 2. The Ld. AR argued that this year is unabated year and the impugned additions are not based on any incriminating material as found during search. Therefore, the impugned additions are not sustainable as per recent decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (149 Taxmann.com

SH. NAVEEN SHIVHARE, ,GWALIOR vs. ITO.,-WARD-3(2), GWALIOR

Appeals stand allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.382/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 3. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.383/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.384/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.318/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 6. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.319/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 7. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.380/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 8. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Shri Naveen Shivhare बनाम/ Acit, Circle-3, M-40, Gandhi Nagar, Gwalior. Gwalior. Vs. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aempg-8216-Z (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Rajendra Sharma, Adv. – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav – Ld. Cit-Dr

20-12-2010. 2. The Ld. AR argued that this year is unabated year and the impugned additions are not based on any incriminating material as found during search. Therefore, the impugned additions are not sustainable as per recent decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (149 Taxmann.com

SH. NAVEEN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ITO.-WARD-3(2), GWALIOR

Appeals stand allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.382/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 3. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.383/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.384/Agr/2013 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.318/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 6. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.319/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 7. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.380/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 8. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.381/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Shri Naveen Shivhare बनाम/ Acit, Circle-3, M-40, Gandhi Nagar, Gwalior. Gwalior. Vs. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aempg-8216-Z (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Rajendra Sharma, Adv. – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav – Ld. Cit-Dr

20-12-2010. 2. The Ld. AR argued that this year is unabated year and the impugned additions are not based on any incriminating material as found during search. Therefore, the impugned additions are not sustainable as per recent decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (149 Taxmann.com

TEJ SINGH,MATHURA vs. ITO 1(3)(4), MATHURA

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

271(1)(b) were not answered by the appellant. Thereafter, a show- cause notice under section 144 was issued by the AO. on 16.11.2016 and on its non-service through the speed post, ITI was deputed to serve it personally on the appellant. Vide his report dated 06.12.2016, the ITI has reported that Shri Tej Singh had expired

MR.AKSHAT DONERIA,GREATER NOIDA vs. ITO-4(1), AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

20,688/- made by the AO, by treating the credit entries appearing in the saving back accounts, as alleged undisclosed income of the appellant. 5) That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A)-I, Noida has erred both in law and on facts in the arbitrarily sustaining the estimated addition