55 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 13(3)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 55 · Page 1 of 3
3. The ld. Counsel for the assessee has contended that the penalty order dated 25.02.2011, as sustained by the ld. CIT(A), is void ab initio, as the notice issued u/s 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) of the Act, on 11.08.2010 was not in conformity with the law. His arguments in this regard shall be presently discussed